The big box model destroys the possibility of any street life in its surroundings.
By Ryan McGreal
Jun. 16, 2005
Look at every big box conglomeration in the Hamilton area (Ancaster Meadowlands, Upper James, etc.), and the same arrangement is repeated:
Instead of building to the sidewalk, facing outward, and opening onto the street, every store turns in toward the interior parking lot, apparently ashamed of its surroundings. This, of course, is consistent with every other architectural travesty built since the 1960s.
Rather than weaving stores firmly into the fabric of the built environment, the big box model segregates stores from their environment inside a bubble that may as well be hermetically sealed to non-drivers.
Take a look at this satellite photo of Upper James and Rymal.
Typical big box conglomeration, northwest corner of Upper James and Rymal (Image Credit: Google Maps)
The smaller buildings on the south and east edges of the development are theoretically on the street, but go there and you'll notice that every one of them points into the parking lot, not out to the street. Reflecting the reality of its surroundings, one of those buildings is a drive-thru bank.
On the surface, it looks like the big box model is a reversal of the mall model, in which a big box in the centre is surrounded on all sides by parking. However, the only real difference between self-contained malls and self-contained big box developments is that people walk through malls but drive through big box developments.
The traditional mall: an enclosed space in the middle of the block, surrounded on all sides by parking. An internal hallway connects the stores.
The Big Box development: a huge parking lot in the middle of the block, with box stores around the edges. Stores face the interior lot, and are not connected by an indoor hallway.
Traditional malls are usually located on cheap suburban land and can only be reached by car, but at least visitors walk once they arrive. Big Box developments replace the interior hallway with a huge parking lot, locating the stores around the edges of the block, facing inward.
Many big box developments, like the gargantuan strip along Golf Links Road in Ancaster, are so colossal and so lacking in basic pedestrian infrastructure that it is nearly impossible to walk from one store to another.
The development along Golf Links Road is so big that a 'street' runs through its middle to connect the stores. Shoppers drive from one box to the next.
It is no overstatement to say that the big box model destroys the possibility of any street life in its surroundings. When it is built on a greenfield, the big box creates and reflects a car-oriented mode of physical and social organization.
When it is retrofitted into an existing urban area, especially one that is struggling against the odds to rebound from a half-century of suburbanization, the big box cannot help but repel pedestrians and overwhelm the street life of its surroundings.
We shape our dwellings, and afterwards our dwellings shape our lives." -- Winston Churchill
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
'Benign Neutrality' is What's Wrong (Jul. 22, 2008) -
Ahhh, things have become a whole lot clearer today after reading a letter to the editor in today's Spectator by John Dolbec of the Hamilton Chamber of Commerce.
The most telling comment i
The City as Dynamic System (Jul. 18, 2008) - I wrote yesterday about the complex and often counterintuitive properties of networks, and the role that simplistic "common sense" thinking can play in leading people to false conclusions about ho
Heat Alert 'Trigger' Too High (Jul. 17, 2008) - Toronto has issued an extreme heat alert - that city's highest warning level to inform and protect vulnerable residents from the dangers of extreme heat. The high humidex is supposed to last u
Passport to Hamilton (Jul. 17, 2008) -
A great new initiative developed by Environment Hamilton and the HSR will be unveiled at a public launch this Friday, July 18th at 10:00 am at Williams Coffee Pub on the waterfront.
Passport
Beyond 'Common Sense': How Traffic Networks Work (Jul. 16, 2008) - With all the talk recently about the Downtown Transportation Master Plan and some councillors' objections to spending money to convert downtown streets to two-way, it seems instructive to stud
Free HSR Fares Not The Way To Go (Jul. 16, 2008) -
Councillor Sam Merulla's recent suggestion that public transit in Hamilton ought to be free would risk making transit an economically and politically unsustainable venture for the city.
T
PRINT EDITION