Special Report: Walkable Streets

Complete Streets Need Improved Transit

Or, How the HSR made me a car commuter.

By Frances Murray
Published July 19, 2013

Way back in the 1980s, I was a young, married woman living in an apartment in Stoney Creek and working on the mountain near Upper James. We were a one-car couple and taking transit was something I was accustomed to and didn't mind. My husband grew up in the country and was used to having a car, and with varying shifts, needed a car for work.

One day, I stopped on my way home from work to shop downtown, and I found out the hard way that the Delaware (#5) bus stopped running past Nash Road at 7:00 PM. I was stranded (in heels!). My husband was at work, and I had no way to get all the way to my home (King at Lake in Stoney Creek).

I don't remember how I got home that night - I may have called a cab from Nash Road. I do know that it wasn't long afterwards that I purchased my own car.

From there I didn't look back. We moved out to the country and having two cars became an unquestioned necessity. I was a full supporter of the "one-way expressways" through the city. "Don't slow down traffic!" was my mantra.

Time passed and my husband and I divorced. Living in Winona, I felt vaguely unhappy, but didn't understand why until I went on an impulsive trip to New York City. The blinders were off! It turned out that I didn't belong in the country at all - I loved the city, I loved the compactness and walkability and the ease of getting around by subway.

Our way of life here, driving everywhere, all of a sudden seemed ridiculous to me. My childhood roots were in Toronto, so city living felt "natural". Eventually, once my daughter finished high school, we moved downtown. Instead of Green Acres, downtown was "the place for me".

Partly for financial reasons and partly as a personal challenge, I took my car off the road for six months. I rented a car once per month to do heavy groceries and other errands, but otherwise took transit or walked. (It was winter so I didn't use my bike.)

I became reacquainted with that vaguely isolated feeling that I had felt living in the country. This was partially because of winter weather, but also because of the HSR's pathetic night-time and Sunday schedules. After 7:00 PM. and on Sundays, the Aberdeen bus runs once per hour. People should never have to wait one hour for a bus.

The Main and King routes were also very infrequent, and the buses were always packed. Striving for standing-room-only seems to be the HSR's policy.

Also - and not to be excessive in my criticism, but most bus drivers didn't seem to consider their standing passengers - or those who had to stand to get off at the next stop. The drivers hit the gas so the bus leapt forward and then jammed on the brakes at the next stop - and this was often the style of driving even when they were not running late! (Buses running ahead of schedule are another issue - this should never happen.)

I was so happy when I put my car back on the road. I still cycled to work in the summer, but having the freedom to get around was something I never want to give up again. (This was reinforced for me lately when my car broke down - a high repair bill at the end of a long line of repair bills. It was time to get a new car - pricey, but again, unquestioned.)

Look, I'm not blaming the HSR management or even the bus drivers for the lack of service. Funding for the HSR has been cut, or not increased in any meaningful way, since I was using transit on a regular basis in the 1980s.

The system needs a huge funding increase. Transit should be easy and cheap. At $2.55 per trip, our system is not over-priced, but it's not easy and service improvements are badly needed.

So the question at the top was: Complete Streets or Improved Transit? Without supplying reliable, easy-to-use transit, we will always have a large segment of the population who refuse to give up their cars and add to the vehicle load on our streets. With that segment demanding fast and smooth traffic movement, our push for complete street revitalization will never gain momentum with the majority of the population.

With improved HSR service, more people will take the opportunity to save some money and park their cars, especially as fuel prices rise. Bus-only lanes will become a necessity, leading to better street design. My contention is this: We need to vastly improve our transit system now, with or without the potential for LRT.

Anyone who cares about positive change in this city and moving toward complete streets should ask their city representative to vote for a funding increase for the HSR.

Frances was born in Toronto and has lived in various places since that time returning to her urban roots in 2010 by moving to downtown Hamilton. She is developing a keen interest in urban issues with a focus on improved walkability and bikeability.


View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By Conrad664 (registered) | Posted July 19, 2013 at 13:29:25

I could not agree with you more Frances

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Mark-AlanWhittle (registered) - website | Posted July 19, 2013 at 15:42:09

Just bought a brand new 2013 Dodge Dart SXT. Public transportation is subsidized by every property tax payer, most of them own at least one car, maybe two. Nothing will force people out of their cars any time soon. I live on a nice quiet street on the mountain, quite walkable, and liveable. Every store has free parking up here. No one-way streets to confuse either.

Permalink | Context

By Ryan (registered) - website | Posted July 19, 2013 at 16:15:41 in reply to Comment 90294

Driving is subsidized by every property tax payer

Fixed that for you. Even when every tax, fee and fine drivers pay is included, driving is subsidized to the tune of billions of dollars from general tax revenues each year.

Permalink | Context

By LOL all over again (anonymous) | Posted July 22, 2013 at 23:30:16 in reply to Comment 90300

ans billions of those general tax dollars are collected from the automotive industry. From mining ore in Labrador, to mining coal in BC and Alberta, shipping it to the steel mills in Hamilton, trucking it to the parts plants all over Ontario, in turn trucking the parts to assembly plants in Oakville or Alliston or Windsor. Every step of the way is taxed. These are some of the best paying jobs in the province and that means they pay high taxes. All those taxes add up to billions and billions. That is what keeps the governments coffers full and keeps the government bribing and paying to keep the car industry in it's jurisdiction.

Not to mention that every body else uses those subsidized roads, the police, the fire department, transit, bikes and even pedestrians. The automobile industry pays for the roads and then some by the time its all said and done.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By DrAwesomesauce (registered) | Posted July 20, 2013 at 07:40:29

A Dodge Dart? Has the American auto industry had a new idea, like, ever? Sorry, I know that's the not the topic up for discussion but, seriously, a Dodge Dart??

Permalink | Context

By LOL all over again (anonymous) | Posted July 22, 2013 at 23:36:10 in reply to Comment 90318

Wow now your a car critic too?

Just in case you didn't know the new Dodge Dart is a Fiat slightly modified for North American markets. This car has a lot of new ideas in it. If it pans out as a great car or crappy car remains to be seen but it is new and it is innovative. One of the first steps by Fiat to use its purchase of Chrysler to gain a foothold in North America.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Anon (anonymous) | Posted July 20, 2013 at 19:24:11

Great article. Thanks for writing it.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools