Is Hamilton ready to have a serious discussion about the future of our city that doesn't resort to name-calling or dismissing whole neighbourhoods as an irredeemable write-off?
By Jason Allen
Published September 28, 2013
In August, I traveled to Calgary, the city in which I grew up, and thanks to a re-location of our various families, I had time to visit old friends I hadn't seen in a while.
Through a miracle of scheduling coincidence, I finally managed to sit down with my old grade-school/University friend Naheed Nenshi, now mayor of Calgary, and his chief of staff Chima Nkemdirim, also a friend from both University and High School.
As one does, when luncheoning with the most popular sitting Mayor in Canada, who swept to office on a wave of social media and voter engagement Calgary hadn't seen in a generation, I asked him: "How did you win?"
His answer revealed as much about a city in transition as it did about his tactical skill at elections.
When Naheed declared his candidacy in early 2010, he did so at a small rally of friends and supporters, during which he made one of his now famous speeches.
At that time, before smartphones were ubiquitous, a local community activist showed up at the speech with a handful of flip-cams and filmed the entire speech - all 14 minutes or so - and posted it to YouTube.
The campaign team watched the results closely, and saw that in a matter of weeks, it was up to 100,000 views.
More importantly, though, when they asked the person who had recorded the speech for his analytics, they revealed that virtually everyone was watching the entire 14 minute video.
In a world of sound-bite politics, it was a remarkable achievement.
It marked what Naheed credits as an important condition for his success: Calgary was ready for the conversation he had been waiting his whole professional life to have.
Calgary was ready for a conversation about urban planning, about limiting sprawl, about transit and cycling and walkability. Calgary was ready to have a lengthy, thoughtful discussion about where it was headed, and where its newly-engaged and passionate citizens wanted to take it.
In the months that followed, Naheed developed his Better Ideas - 12 platform planks for improving Calgary. Each policy statement contained a one-page summary, plus extensive briefing notes that in some cases ran to a dozen pages.
In the latter stages of the campaign, a member of the media analyzed the various campaigns' literature, and found that one of Naheed's briefings contained more pages of content than all of the other Mayoralty candidates' platforms combined.
Calgary was indeed ready for what Naheed had branded as 'Politics in Complete Sentences.'
This raises the question: Is Hamilton ready for the same discussion?
Active participation has spread far beyond a small group of groundbreaking activists to a large, complex web of people engaging in projects and campaigns that they care about deeply, and to which they bring a diverse set of skills.
We have Canada's only crowd-funded journalist, and an influx of energetic residents who are not prepared to settle for the second-best to which many Hamiltonians seem to have become resigned. Their views are infectious.
Now a broad cross-section of Hamiltonians (both demographic and geographic) seems prepared to be uncharacteristically vocal about where they want their city to be headed, in a way that is clearly alarming to some long-serving Councillors.
But while the sense of optimism in what Graham Crawford has dubbed the New Hamilton is spreading, there are still large numbers of Hamiltonians who seem mired in old ways of doing things.
More concerned about travel times from Hwy 403 through Downtown than the safety of those who live there. More concerned about reducing taxes than building badly-needed infrastructure. More ready than ever to write off entire sections of the city as a cesspool that they would never have any reason to visit. As willing as ever to leave the detail-shmetail up to someone else.
A tension also exists between the urban and suburban, between the lower city and the rest of amalgamated Hamilton that continues to dominate the decision-making process at city hall.
It's a tension that has paralyzed Toronto, but due to the almost entirely suburban make-up of Calgary, doesn't factor as much into their situation.
In Hamilton, though, this fundamental disagreement on how the city should be structured seems to impede every step forward that the progressive voices on Council try to take. Someone must be telling their councillors to vote this way.
We're left with the question: Is Hamilton ready to have a serious discussion about the future of our city? One that doesn't resort to name-calling or painting the proud neighbourhoods of tens of thousands of Hamiltonians as an irredeemable write-off?
And if so, who is our Naheed Nenshi?
First published on Jason's website.
You must be logged in to comment.