Jeremy Freiburger believes City Council finally "gets it" about preserving the Lister Block.
By Letter to the Editor
Oct. 6, 2006
I was there for the City Council meeting that discussed the new Lister Block plan on September 27.
It seems as thought the plan is now one of "rehabiitation," as the architects called it: not full restoration or preservation but a hybrid approach.
They are now moving public health into the Lister instead of community services. This makes a lot of sense financially as the province contributes up to 75 percent of some costs when public health moves, but not so with community services. This will help offset the increased cost of this proposal.
The main floor will still be commercial from my understanding, with fewer spaces on the ground floor being taken up by the City and more by private businesses.
I honestly like the new plan. It's fairer, if still not completely fair in my eyes, and relatively progressive.
Last night, I honestly saw Council finally understand that the Lister must not be torn down. Both consultant architects made this abundantly clear, and council heard it in no uncertain terms. The building is sound and needs to be saved through this intervention process.
I'm happy with this plan.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Freiburger
Stick them in the building that keeps pumping out the legionnaires... that'll teach em.
I actually like the idea of converting to residential mentioned above... The current proposals are all crap. The city balked 5 or 6 years ago at renting office space at less than half what they're offering to pay now. Back then they said it was too expensive. Now they're falling all over themselves to pay the highest rent in the area... That's us that will have to pay that rent, whether it comes from the province or the city...
I've been in the building a few years ago. The structure is solid, the facade can be repaired with the damaged pieces of terra-cotta replicated in fibreglass for a reasonable cost. I couldn't find the lovely tile floor they go on about, and I was looking for it... Either way, the building is totally impractical for office use without major enlargement... It's actually very tiny inside.
Residential sounds like a really interesting idea + there's a pool in the basement already, but I'm not sure the Lister's big enough to pay for the renovations
ISSN: 1715-1554
Civic Monument or Big Box: Your Call (Oct. 10, 2008) - Mayor Fred has posted a survey on his website asking for public input on how to proceed with the renovations of city hall.
Go check it out and make your opinion count.
For those who don't
Sad But Funny (Oct. 9, 2008) - We'll need to file this one in the 'sad but funny' file at RTH - Toronto City Council voted on Tuesday to name their newest North York street, 'OMB Folly'.
This after the OM
Letter to Council: City Hall Deserves Better (Oct. 6, 2008) - Dear Mayor and Members of Council,
I've been following the ongoing discussions regarding the renovations of Hamilton City Hall.
As a resident and taxpayer in Hamilton, I certainly apprec
Authoritarianism Meets Stylishness (Oct. 6, 2008) - A couple of interesting articles in this weekend's Toronto Star. First off there's Thomas Walkhom's analysis of free market economics versus 'authoritarian capitalism'. Citing
Mayor: 'Stars Aligning' for Light Rail, Gore Plaza Moving Forward (Oct. 3, 2008) - I spoke this morning with Mayor Fred Eisenberger about light rail, economic development and the Gore Master Plan Study. He was understandably excited about the gathering momentum on light rail in
Sooner or Loiter (Oct. 3, 2008) -
An article in today's Spectator about the city's plan to revitalize Gore Park confused me:
Vendors. Entertainment. A peace memorial. Less loitering. A friendlier climate.
V
By Trevor
Posted 10/6/2006 11:49:58 AM
Is Public Health moving from the Right House to the Lister? If so that's hardly an improvement, since Right House will surely close then.
Commercial space on the ground floor? What is 2000 sq feet? Its one dinky little store, they probably mean moving the Right House Tim Hortons to Lister as well and call it mixed-use.
It time to consider Lister being a residential building. Styled into NYC apartments with a ground floor mall where the retail has two fronts, one to the street and one to the inner mall.
The low floor to floor height and support columns cause too many obstacles to a wide open office space, it just makes more sense as a residential building. James and King William is also more condusive to residential living.
If we need office space. Then build a proper post-modern tower at the parking lot of King and Bay. Or move into Stelco Tower and make the high vacancy rate look a little better on paper.
(Permalink)