Raise the Hammer
For this issue, we have asked the candidates to share their ideas on how to improve the city.
By Ryan McGreal
Oct. 20, 2006
In a vicious, self-fulfilling prophecy, newspapers and TV news stations tend to decide early on which candidates for office are "high profile" or have a chance at winning. Those candidates get all the attention, interviews, and coverage. The other candidates are essentially ignored.
At Raise the Hammer, we don't believe this is the best way for the newsmedia to support the democratic process. Instead, we are dedicating this issue and the next to the election, and reporting on all the candidates we could track down, not just those whom we think will win. For this issue, we have asked the candidates to share their ideas on how to improve the city.
Our methodology was very simple. We sent an email to every candidate for whom we could find an email address, and asked the following question:
What are the five most important actions you would take to improve Hamilton, and why? (Please be specific. For example, "Improve accountability" is too vague; in this example, explain how you would improve accountability.)
If the candidate responded, even if only to refer to his or her website, then we included their response or a precis of their platform. In some cases, we replied to candidates asking for more details about a particular action. We also sent a follow-up email to candidates who had not replied to our first query.
We sent out 51 quesionnaires. Altogether, we received just 25 responses - less than half. (Ironically, among who did not reply are some "high profile" candidates. Presumably, they're doing well enough that they don't need the exposure.)
From Wards 5, 6, 14, and 15, we received no responses at all. Readers from those wards will have to keep looking for information on their candidates for office.
Among the candidates who responded, very few seemed to show any real vision, and many resorted to standard electioneering boilerplate: "more accountability," "lower taxes," "new infrastructure," "civic pride," and so on.
Most candidates opposed intensification, which is troublesome given the city's long-term growth strategy and the realities of climate change, global oil production, and declining farmland. Even in wards in the downtown core, which were originally designed for density and are suffering acutely from the effects of falling population, candidates referred to intensification as a "disruptive element" in neighbourhoods.
Only one candidate advocated making energy production and conservation a key economic cluster in the city's development plan, even though this was the recommendation of Richard Gilbert's peak oil report to council earlier this year and may be the most important investment Hamilton can make in the coming decades.
Only one candidate advocated a climate change action plan for the city, even though this may be the biggest crisis the world will face in this century.
Only three candidates advocated a rapid transit line running on the electrical grid, even though this is widely regarded as the cleanest, most sustainable form of public transportation, as well as the form most likely to attract adjacent private sector investment. Several candidates made general noises about "improving public transit" but offered no plan.
Only six candidates advocated cleaning up Hamilton's brownfield sites, including several incumbents, and none described an actual plan to achieve this.
All in all, an underwhelming bunch with just a few bright exceptions. Regardless of who ends up winning in each ward, it will take a lot of concerted pressure from citizens to ensure that this council acts in the interest of this city.
Read all the candidates' responses on our website: www.raisethehammer.org.
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 10/21/2006 9:10:24 AM
I just received a note from Nathalie Xian Yi Yan, a candidate for Ward 6, which notes the following commitments:
* Advocating ecological and environmental oriented projects
* Helping to build intergenerational family units
* Encouraging the acceptance of all cultures and faith groups
* Supporting individual involvements to beautify the city
* Standing for women's equality and children's isues
* Improving public services delivered by the city
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Aerotropolis: Will It Fly? - Wednesday, December 3, 2008, at Mount Hope Community Hall, 3027 Homestead Dr., Mount Hope.
McMaster ruffles some feathers with child ward renaming (Dec. 3, 2008) - An article in the Globe and Mail, Health care in a bucket with fries, came to the attention of a RTH reader recently, who sent it along for us to check out (thanks, by the way!)
The article is ab
Can Harper Prorogue Parliament? (Dec. 3, 2008) - Given the paucity of Prime Minister Stephen Harpers options as Monday's confidence vote draws closer, pundits and analysts are coalescing around the conclusion that he will ask Governor Genera
Picking a Prime Minister: A Parliamentary Primer (Dec. 2, 2008) -
We will use all legal means to resist this undemocratic seizure of power.
-- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
With the Liberals and NDP agreeing to a coalition with the support of the B
Bratina: City Hall Plan Could Save $110 Million Over 20 Years (Dec. 2, 2008) - Councillor Bob Bratina, who has proposed that the City remain at Hamilton City Centre, is claiming that this move will cost only $50 million over the next 20 years, compared to $150 million to com
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) - Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Same Old 'Traffic Trumps Everything' Thinking (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Apparently, the City Traffic department still doesn't get it.
After turning James and John into two-way streets that slowed traffic down, the city is now looking for ways to speed thing
By jason
Posted 10/20/2006 12:20:07 PM
what else is new......
(Permalink)