Raise the Hammer
Light rail is a way for Hamilton to turn a one-time $300 million gift into a long-term perpetual income instead of a long term property tax sinkhole.
By Sean Burak
Dec. 20, 2007
Ontario's recent transit spending spree is fantastic news, but we have to be sure that Hamilton gets its fair share.
These new buses are a welcome addition to the HSR system, but the problem of operating expenses is a serious one. We already have difficulty keeping our current system running, and more buses will add to the costs down the road.
With much more provincial capital still to come, we need to be careful how we use it. We can't afford to spend all of the MoveOntario 2020 money on more buses - we need to seriously investigate spending on light rail instead.
Light rail costs more initially, but the Province is covering that bill. If we ask for light rail from the province, the result to the city will be a significant decrease in long term per passenger operating costs.
Light rail moves many more passengers per driver/operator. Light rail expenses are not tied to rising gas prices. Light rail maintenance is cheaper than bus maintenance. Light rail attracts more riders than buses do - riders whose fares will feed money into the HSR. Light rail infrastructure and trains last much longer than asphalt and bus hardware.
On top of all this, light rail attracts private investors in a way that buses never ever will - the return on investment for light rail installed in other cities starts at 900 percent and has been as high as four thousand percent, and this return will be ours for the taking thanks to the province of Ontario's investment.
In other words, this is a way for us to turn a one-time $300 million gift into a long-term perpetual income instead of a long term property tax sinkhole.
Other cities have proposed light rail and been approved; we only need to ask and it is very likely we'll receive as well.
Let's not spend another MoveOntario dollar on buses. Let's do this right.
The search for truth is a cooperative, unending endeavour. We can, and should, engage in it to the extent we can and encourage others to do so as well, seeking to free ourselves from constraints imposed by coercive institutions, dogma, irrationality, excessive conformity and lack of initiative and imagination, and numerous other obstacles." -- Noam Chomsky
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Civic Monument or Big Box: Your Call (Oct. 10, 2008) - Mayor Fred has posted a survey on his website asking for public input on how to proceed with the renovations of city hall.
Go check it out and make your opinion count.
For those who don't
Sad But Funny (Oct. 9, 2008) - We'll need to file this one in the 'sad but funny' file at RTH - Toronto City Council voted on Tuesday to name their newest North York street, 'OMB Folly'.
This after the OM
Letter to Council: City Hall Deserves Better (Oct. 6, 2008) - Dear Mayor and Members of Council,
I've been following the ongoing discussions regarding the renovations of Hamilton City Hall.
As a resident and taxpayer in Hamilton, I certainly apprec
Authoritarianism Meets Stylishness (Oct. 6, 2008) - A couple of interesting articles in this weekend's Toronto Star. First off there's Thomas Walkhom's analysis of free market economics versus 'authoritarian capitalism'. Citing
Mayor: 'Stars Aligning' for Light Rail, Gore Plaza Moving Forward (Oct. 3, 2008) - I spoke this morning with Mayor Fred Eisenberger about light rail, economic development and the Gore Master Plan Study. He was understandably excited about the gathering momentum on light rail in
Sooner or Loiter (Oct. 3, 2008) -
An article in today's Spectator about the city's plan to revitalize Gore Park confused me:
Vendors. Entertainment. A peace memorial. Less loitering. A friendlier climate.
V