If we understand how healthy cities work, the citizens of Hamilton can revitalize our wonderful city.
By Ryan McGreal
May. 16, 2005
We were going to call this our manifesto, but we're already mistaken for communists too much as it is. Something about "Soviet style pop-art"...
Anyway, here's a list of the core principles that govern urban life. By understanding and applying these principles, the citizens of Hamilton can revitalize our wonderful city. These principles aren't in any particular order.
Cities are not suburbs, towns, or villages. The great benefit of cities is their complexity, diversity, variety, anonymity, and privacy.
The normal comings and goings of various individuals in the city generate neighbourhoods, local nodes, and distinct characters. This complex process cannot be duplicated in the laboratory or manufactured.
When a city tries to deny its true nature as a dense, complex urban ecosystem by micromanaging, regulating, and separating its various functions, it begins to kill itself. "Rationalizing" the city is like clearcutting a rainforest to plant wheat. After a few years, everything starts blowing away.
The downtown core is the heart of the city. Without a healthy core, the city as a whole cannot function.
The public life of the city is in its streets, or it's nowhere.
Public policies (tax and regulatory) should not subsidize sprawl or car-based transportation. If people had to pay the real price of living in the suburbs, fewer people would do so.
When a city tries to let everyone drive everywhere, it begins to turn into a massive suburb, with roads and parking crowding everything else out.
The built environment should support a vibrant street life: wide sidewalks, street walls, street-level businesses, and mixed uses.
Regulations should be as simple as possible, and they should encourage open, diverse, creative development within a coherent framework that supports street life.
To encourage good streets: build to the sidewalk, make buildings compatible with their neighbours, open directly onto the street, let owners decide how to use their buildings, and never put parking between the sidewalk and the door.
Buildings should face out, not in. Plazas, parks, and atria are insincere attempts to transform city blocks into pastoral theme parks. They also display a contempt for the fabric of city life that make them immediately suspect.
Streets are for everyone, not just drivers. Two way streets, lower speed limits, and market priced curbside parking can slow the cars, make it easier for cyclists to share the road, and make sidewalks safer and more relaxing for pedestrians.
One way streets are de facto expressways right through the city. No one wants to walk, stand, or sit next to an expressway.
It looks very much like cheap energy is soon going to be a thing of the past. Our transportation infrastructure should reflect this fact, emphasizing and promoting the least energy-intensive ways of getting around.
Developments that are small-scale, localized, and idiosyncratic are better than developments that are large-scale, centralized, and dull.
Everyone deserves a decent place to live, and dreary housing projects, decaying ghettoes, and park benches do not qualify. The best way for cities to assist low income residents is simply to help with their home payments (even better is to require that employers pay a living wage).
Mixed housing is a good way to avoid both ghettoes and quasi-gated communities.
Public mega-projects are almost always a bad idea, costing too much and delivering too little. They demolish neighbourhoods to bolster politicans' egos.
What elements of healthy cities did we miss? Please send your ideas to principles@raisethehammer.org or post them to the comments form at the bottom of this page.
The Lister Block will be restored. If there are pieces that cannot be restored, they will be replicated. What you're going to see is the Lister Block restored, with the exception of several buildings adjacent to it. ... You will see a brand-new building with the Lister Block incorporated in it." -- Joe Mancinelli, Vice-President, Labourers' Union of North America (LIUNA)
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Defining "Squelchers" (May. 15, 2008) -
From Richard Florida's Who's Your City? (Random House Canada 2008), p. 181:
Jane Jacobs once told me that communities everywhere are filled with creative vigor, but that some of the
On Beggars and Choosers (May. 14, 2008) - I'm reading Richard Florida's new book Who's Your City?, and it's an absolute banquet of insights into how cities work and how to make them work better, backed by robust statistica
Red Hill Promise Fulfilled? (May. 14, 2008) - Red Hill Valley Parkway supporters are crowing about a new box store opening on Barton near Woodward as if this were a validation of their support and a repudiation of its opponents. A brilliantly
Album Review: Bang! by Drowning Girl (May. 10, 2008) -
When "Bang!" (Puck Eye Records, 2007), the debut album by Toronto's Drowning Girl, landed on my desk, I had no idea what to expect. I had heard only that they played "indie pop", s
Light Rail: Biggest Challenges Lie Ahead (May. 9, 2008) - With the announcement by the city's rapid transit office that the public comments they've received have strongly supported light rail, we may be tempted to rest on our laurels and assume t
City: Strong Public Support for Light Rail (May. 9, 2008) -
The city's department of public works just issued a press release summarizing the two public information centres it held this week on the Rapid Transit Feasibility Study (RTFS).
According
PRINT EDITION
By grahamia
Posted 8/14/2006 3:45:05 PM
I agree with the principles, but would like to see what relocalization movement has to contribute. see for example Folke Gunther's work from Sweden on ruralization. see RURALISATION
A POSSIBLE WAY TO ALLEVIATE OUR CURRENT VULNERABILITY
PROBLEMS
Folke Günther
Holon Ecosystem Consultant
Kollegievägen 19
224 73 Lund
S
URL: http://www.holon.se/folke/
E-mail: folke@holon.se
(Permalink)