By Ryan McGreal
Published September 03, 2009
An unlicenced Hamilton roofing contractor was just sentenced to 30 days in jail, two years' probation and $45,000 in fines for misrepresentation and refusing to refund deposits. The contractor, Jason Dennis, was convicted at five different locations and is also being charged with criminal fraud.
Reading this story, I could think was, There's no way this guy should have been able to get away with ripping off a second customer after doing it the first time.
The fact that he managed to rip off at least five people - and he's the fourth unlicenced and/or fraudulent contractor convicted since this past spring - suggests that the contracting business in Hamilton is a bit of a 'wild west'.
The city's Building Services Division is taking a more proactive approach and "actively seeking out unlicenced contractors through a number of methods", according to John Lane, manager of building inspections.
Unlicensed contractors also seem to need a constant reminder that it is illegal to operate in Hamilton without a trade licence. Contractors are responsible for ensuring that they have all of the correct licences and paperwork, which should be readily available so they can provide assurances to potential customers and Building Services and Municipal Law Enforcement staff. The message is getting out there because public inquiries about which contractors are licensed have doubled.
What this tells us is that consumers don't currently have easy access to good information on which contractors have a history of being reliable. This is a pretty serious market failure insofar as markets function efficiently when their participants are informed enough to make rational decisions.
The city press release about this conviction makes some recommendations on hiring a contractor - don't be pressured into signing anything, insist on an itemized, written estimate, always get three other quotes - and lists some resources that residents can use:
With the exception of the Consumer Beware list, which allows users to search a database to see if a contractor has been convicted of a crime, this bundle of resources is almost uniformly clunky and hard to use.
There seems to be a real opportunity here to create an online resource that people can use to report their experiences with contractors and easily look up contractors' licence status, track records (reporting links between individuals and their various companies) and criminal records if any.
It could start by focusing on Hamilton and area contractors, but it would make sense to design the tool so that other cities can be brought in easily.
Of course, there would have to be validation to ensure that negative reviews aren't posted in bad faith, but there are plenty of examples of online trust-based systems that work very well and are effectively self-policing.
Such a resource could both correct the current market failure of poor and disconnected information about contractors and present a potentially lucrative business opportunity for the person or people who develop it.
You must be logged in to comment.