Transportation

Transit is not Welfare

By Ryan McGreal
Published December 06, 2005

(I sent this letter to Mayor Larry Di Ianni and City Councillors)

If Hamilton wants to grow up and become a proper city, then City Council needs to stop regarding transit as a marginal social service that it can trim to save a little money.

Every great city in the world has an excellent transit system that functions as an integral part of an efficient, effective transportation infrastructure, not as welfare.

We talk about using tax revenue to "invest" in roads and highway capacity, but "subsidize" transit. This double standard has to end.

The City of Portland, Oregon has invested heavily in light rail, dramatically increasing ridership and attracting $2.4 billion (USD) in new private investment.

Portland has experienced robust economic growth over the past decade while actually reducing significantly its output of greenhouse gases by replacing automobile trips with transit.

In successful cities, people choose transit because it is the best way to get around, and that convenience helps provide the conditions for a healthy economy that attracts investment.

This creates a more level playing field for access to employment and all city amenities and services, providing benefits to everyone, including people who use transit because they don't have a choice.

Ryan McGreal, the editor of Raise the Hammer, lives in Hamilton with his family and works as a programmer, writer and consultant. Ryan volunteers with Hamilton Light Rail, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. Ryan writes a city affairs column in Hamilton Magazine, and several of his articles have been published in the Hamilton Spectator. He also maintains a personal website and has been known to post passing thoughts on Twitter @RyanMcGreal. Recently, he took the plunge and finally joined Facebook.

2 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By judgefred (registered) | Posted December 10, 2005 at 06:22:01

What happened to the provincial gas tax that was going to go public transit? Is council using it for other expenses or has transit become so much better that it requires even more cash?

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Ryan (registered) - website | Posted December 28, 2005 at 09:16:14

The city has been talking about using the gas tax to cover the budget deficit - i.e. to help cover the cost of Red Hill - because, get this, investing in transit would result in inflationary cost increases.

For more, see:

http://www.raisethehammer.org/blog.asp?id=044 http://www.raisethehammer.org/index.asp?... http://www.raisethehammer.org/blog.asp?i... http://www.raisethehammer.org/index.asp?...

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds