Light Rail

Rapid Transit Citizens Advisory Committee Letter to Mayor and Council

By RTH Staff
Published August 11, 2011

The City of Hamilton's Rapid Transit Citizens Advisory Committee (RTCAC) sent the following letter to Mayor Bob Bratina and Council on August 4, 2011, signed on behalf the RTCAC members by Alaric Woodrow.

I write on behalf of the Rapid Transit Citizen Advisory Committee (RTCAC), regarding recent comments in the media concerning the future development of Light Rail Transit within Hamilton.

The RTCAC members, who represent a broad cross-section of citizens, have been extensively involved with engaging the public in this project over the last year. Based upon this interaction in various locations across the city we believe that there is strong public support for the LRT proposal. Recent statements of city representatives to the media would indicate that there is a mis-reading of public support for the LRT by certain members of Council.

The fact is that current planning work has not been finished and so the current "public" message from City representatives appears to indicate a premature loss of interest in LRT, one taken BEFORE all the facts are known. In light of this, the RTCAC strongly believes that the recent decision by the City Manager to curtail planning and evaluation of the LRT is unfounded and unwise, and it has given the public an inaccurate message that the project has been stopped in its tracks.

The recent statements also make it appear for our choice to be between GO Transit and LRT. It is well known, understood and agreed that GO Transit is a prior priority and will be implemented first, and largely paid for by the Province through Metrolinx - with the city-building LRT to be completed as late as 2020 or even later.

Therefore the RTCAC believes it would be appropriate for City Council to make it clear to the public now that there is continued support for the LRT proposal on Council, subject, of course, to the necessary funding being secured.

Further, although there is a perception that LRT will have significant costs there is no current message given by City City representatives to reassure the public of the benefits of such a system, nor of of the efforts being made to secure funds.

Given these perceptions, we feel we must emphasize that public messages should be based upon accurate and up-to-date information that only develops as all aspects of this significant endeavour are explored in the planning stages. Without such information, any statements to the media are subject to misrepresentation of where the City stands on the issue.

The members of the RTCAC believe that it would be beneficial for our city to have both the LRT system and daily GO service. It is not a matter of an either/or scenario, since both are considered important for the city, although for different reasons.

As a practical measure to be taken now, we also believe that planning for the City's 2012 budget should include funding for the continued study of LRT and for the staff required for such studies.

Given that this LRT project represents an opportunity to develop the city in a manner that will serve all of its citizens well for many generations and provide millions of dollars in much-needed tax revenues, the RTCAC believes that we cannot afford to be left out in the cold while other cities move ahead by accepting the funding opportunities offered by the Province. To secure such commitments, it is vital that we do not lose our momentum, and continue the diligent planning for this project.

2 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By AETHERMAN (registered) | Posted August 13, 2011 at 01:25:16

"IF" LRT ever becomes a reality, I'll bet those BIA LRT advocates and normal business owners along LRT routes will WHINE OUT LOUD about increased property taxes, having a much harder time selling their buildings, experiencing rattling windows and vibrations that will knock products off shelves and walls, make apartment tenants complain, etc. when LRT's pass by many times every day of the year! Steel wheels rolling on gapped steel rails send out infrasonic vibrations! Rubber tires on Buses don't do that! (db)

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By AETHERMAN (registered) | Posted August 13, 2011 at 01:32:44

BUSES offer many advantages over any LRT! (1)Buses can drive almost anywhere and therefore easily detour accident or road closure scenes, (2)Buses offer much greater safety to pedestrians who board and exit them when they make stops next to curbs as opposed to trains stopping one full lane away from curbs, (3)Buses can perform Fast Emergency Stops, where LRT's would slide much farther on wet slippery rails, (4) Buses will not be "dead in the water" when the power grid is down, (5)Buses do not have High Voltage(550 Volts?) overhead power wires connected to them that could electrocute pedestrians and motorists when they fall during storms and other reasons, (6)Buses are not prone to be struck by lightning because they ride on rubber tires, (7)Buses do not connect to arcing overhead power wires that are known to cause annoying "snap, crackle & popping sounds" on all types of Radio's & TV's, (8)Buses do not require power poles to connect to overhead wires like LRT's, so drivers do not have to waste time re-attaching such devices when they slip off and dangle around in the air like a drunken sailor,(9)Buses can be easily towed away if they break down, (10)The streets don't have to be bastardized with rails or the asphalt around them requiring constant costly repairs due to winter water freezing, heaving and salt erosions, (11)Other vehicles don't have to dodge around wet slippery rails, (12)Buses can be operated on clean Natural Gas as opposed to diesel. etc. (db)

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds