Transportation

Only One Speed Fits the Life-Sized City

By Ryan McGreal
Published February 17, 2014

Mikael Colville-Andersen of Copenhagenize has produced a stark visualization of the well-understood relationship between vehicle speed and injury when an automobile hits a pedestrian.

Only One Speed Fits The Life-Sized City
Only One Speed Fits The Life-Sized City

Ryan McGreal, the editor of Raise the Hammer, lives in Hamilton with his family and works as a programmer, writer and consultant. Ryan volunteers with Hamilton Light Rail, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. Ryan writes a city affairs column in Hamilton Magazine, and several of his articles have been published in the Hamilton Spectator. He also maintains a personal website and has been known to post passing thoughts on Twitter @RyanMcGreal. Recently, he took the plunge and finally joined Facebook.

11 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By Fred Street (anonymous) | Posted February 17, 2014 at 15:37:07

Neat infographic. Would have been ideal to have relative percentages in the mix (mostly b/c of my astonishment at how many pedestrians are uninjured by 50kmh vehicular collisions.)

Question: While 20mph/32kmh is widely touted for its reduced mortality threat, how does 25mph/40kmh fit stack up? (Asking in light of the fact that city streets are rated for 50kmh and speeds regularly pace at 60kmh.)

Permalink | Context

By AnjoMan (registered) | Posted February 18, 2014 at 10:57:07 in reply to Comment 97652

I can't answer your question, but I do want to point out that the issue is much more than just what is an ideal speed limit. People drive 10-20 kmph over the speed limit not because they want to flout the law, but because the roadway allows it. If we really want to address high speed driving in the city we need to change more than just a bunch of street signs.

Permalink | Context

By Fred Street (anonymous) | Posted February 18, 2014 at 11:39:59 in reply to Comment 97660

I agree that street design is certainly a key part of the "walk-/bike-safe" equation, but knowing how enthusiastically the City has taken to complete streets funding and implementation, enforcement may play a part as well.

Regardless of whether law-breaking is active or passive, the contravention needs to be recognized. Habitually granting latitude eventually makes transgression the new normal.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By restraint (anonymous) | Posted February 18, 2014 at 12:03:16

as a frequent driver i would love to travel on streets that were designed properly and encouraged speeds below the legal limit. it is always very apparent when one is traveling on an improperly built road, always checking to be certain that one is not breaking the law. on a properly designed road most people should feel uncomfortable driving above the speed limit. as mentioned earlier, most of our roads are the opposite; most drivers feel comfortable at least 10 km/h above the posted limit.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By durander (registered) | Posted February 19, 2014 at 11:55:46

Interesting that a Spec article today stated that roadway fatalities and injuries are at the lowest level in over a decade...maybe the roads here aren't as bad as everyone would make them out to be?

Permalink | Context

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted February 19, 2014 at 12:08:39 in reply to Comment 97698

The death and injury rates for motorists have showed a long steady decline, which is continuing. This is mostly due to enforcement of drunk driving and improved vehicle design.

Unfortunately, the deaths and injuries of pedestrians and cyclists has actually increased. And that is the issue is here.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/12/31/...

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By myrcurial (registered) - website | Posted February 19, 2014 at 17:00:06

Interesting that on lower city residential streets, with snow piles on one side and poorly parked cars on the other rendering the street effectively one lane, ~25% of the idiots I see driving by my house exceed the 50km/h limit. I'm not sure how to design a street for the uber-entitled jerk type who feels that driving is a right.

Also realizing that the performance of most new vehicles exceeds the ability of most drivers by a significant margin - that must contribute to the speeding problem too.

Permalink | Context

By jason (registered) | Posted February 19, 2014 at 22:54:50 in reply to Comment 97716

Winter is absolutely the safest time on our downtown street. Cars are forced to give way to oncoming traffic and drive slow due to the piles of snow/ice. Soon enough spring will be here and we'll be warning our kids about being out front as morons do 75km/hr through a residential neighbourhood.

Interestingly enough, I haven't seen one letter to the editor of the Spec complaining how hard it is to get around now that people can't speed down Peter St or Cannon/Wilson. I use Cannon/Wilson several times a week and much of this winter it has had 1 less lane than usual due to snowbanks and deep snow on the actual roadway. Many days we've travelled about 40-45km/hr along Wilson to work. No problem at all. Everyone has gotten to where they are going and my trip times only increased by a minute to a minute and a half. We should engineer these streets to function like this all year.

Comment edited by jason on 2014-02-19 22:57:05

Permalink | Context

By Rimshot (anonymous) | Posted February 22, 2014 at 09:31:22 in reply to Comment 97725

But then the City'd have to plow the whole street.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Capitalist (anonymous) | Posted March 06, 2014 at 15:30:58

So Ryan what are you trying to say? That the speed limit should be reduced to 30km/h? Good luck with that. Maybe 30km/h would save some lives but then you greens would complain that more people are dying from the increased air pollution that slow car speeds generate.

By the way, your picture needs some editing. The little man should be talking on his smartphone just before he gets hit. That would make it more accurate :)

Permalink | Context

By Ryan (registered) - website | Posted March 06, 2014 at 16:08:14 in reply to Comment 98259

Good luck with that.

Thank you. While a number of cities in North American and Europe are already adopting speed limits - including Hamilton's North End - it will be a challenge to overcome the status quo mentality that reflexively believes fast driving is more important than safety.

then you greens would complain that more people are dying from the increased air pollution that slow car speeds generate.

You're wrong. Vehicle emissions go up with increasing speed, not down.

The little man should be talking on his smartphone just before he gets hit.

Wrong again. The people getting hit by cars are disproportionately senior citizens and children. Your stereotype does not fit the facts.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds