(This blog entry has been updated.)
Graeme MacKay, the Hamilton Spectator's sharp, funny, and sometimes mean-spirited editorial cartoonist, took one last opportunity to throw a swipe at Joanna Chapman, the private citizen who did City Council's job for them and personally pursued charges against Mayor Larry Di Ianni for his violations of the Ontario Municipal Elections act.
Turning the David-and-Goliath mythos on its head, MacKay's November 15 cartoon shows a gleeful, witchlike Chapman brushing off her hands as she drops a slingshot and walks away from the giant feet of her slain opponent, who lies in repose with a "Re-elect Larry Di Ianni" sign resting against his shin.
This closes a trilogy that started with a malevolent, scheming Chapman pushing Mayor Humpty Dumpty off the wall and continued with a sorcerous (complete with black cat) Chapman monkey hanging onto Di Ianni's back.
Again and again, we see the habit of blaming the whistleblower and sympathizing with the whistleblown.
Joanna Chapman did not break or even bend the law: she enforced it. When she first raised the issue with council, they failed to do their job and launch an audit on the Mayor, preferring to close ranks around one of their own.
Di Ianni denied any wrongdoing and attacked Chapman's character until the evidence was overwhelming that Chapman was onto something, and then he switched to claiming he had made an "honest mistake".
All along, the Spec echoed Di Ianni's line despite the actual facts of his overcontributions, which make the "honest mistake" excuse laughably implausible.
Finally, when voters chose Eisenberger over Di Ianni - by a narrow margin, to be sure, but remarkably considering Di Ianni outspent Eisenberger by something like 20 to 1 - the collective response from Di Ianni's bought priesthood was a kind of flabbergasted outrage.
Again, the response has been to attack the Chapmans of the city for assailing Di Ianni's credibility, instead of asking whether their own uncritical support for the disgraced Mayor led them into self-delusion.
It bears repeating one last time: no one hurt Di Ianni's credibility or integrity but himself. No one broke the law and then lied about it but Di Ianni himself. All Chapman did was to demand that City Council fulfil its obligation to investigate Di Ianni's violations, and then to pursue the matter herself when Council abrogated that obligation.
If holding someone accountable for their crimes and abuses is a despicable act, then our law enforcement agencies and institutions are equally to be despised, but I don't see anyone at the Spec suggesting that the police are nasty and vindictive when they investigate crimes and arrest suspects.
Chapman's real 'treachery' was not in targetting Di Ianni but in demanding that he be held accountable: to the law, to his peers, and to the public. Accountability is the enemy of cronyism, so the cronies do all they can to discredit attempts to enforce it.
Until now, the city's political culture has been secretive, insular, and dogmatically self-reinforcing. Mayor-elect Fred Eisenberger ran a successful campaign on a promise to transform the cosy, buddy-buddy culture at 71 Main St. W. into a culture where accountability encourages integrity. If he's serious about this, he has an uphill battle ahead of him.
Update: Graeme MacKay wrote an insightful and instructive response to this piece in his blog.
You must be logged in to comment.