Revitalization

Power Centres and the Powerless Centre

By Ryan McGreal
Published December 04, 2006

One thing the Hamilton Spectator's November 20, 2006 traffic report demonstrated is that Hamiltonians are trapped in a self-reinforcing cycle of auto-dependency that is moving the city's centre of gravity away from its more energy-efficient, sustainable core.

Ted Mitchell analyzed the data and found that traffic on the city's key mountain highways - 403/Linc, QEW/20, and QEW/403 - is growing faster than the city's population. Mitchell concluded:

We are growing in numbers and buying cars at about the same rate of about 1 percent annually. But on the roads, the use of vehicles is increasing about 3 to 4 times the rate of population growth.

All the talk about GRIDS and its vaunted nodes-and-corridors aside, we are still building an aggressively zoned, automobile-based, highway-connected land use and transportation system.

Power Centres

This extends to the recent approval of so-called "power centres", big box commercial plazas of warehouse-sized stores surrounding a vast central parking area, at key locations around the city's edge.

The development planned for Clappison's Corners at Hwy. 5 and 6 may be the most contentious. Hwy 6, which cuts through the escarpment from the 403 north through Flamborough and on to Hwy 401 and Guelph, is already treacherously clogged and has little room to expand.

The intersection itself is a multi-lane nightmare, built at a scale totally inhospitable to pedestrian or cycle traffic, and doomed to degrade further with the addition of the new retail conglomerate.

Clappisons Corners (Image Credit: Google Maps)
Clappisons Corners (Image Credit: Google Maps)

How will 5 and 6 cope with all the new growth in traffic this development will attract? Enter the latest in an ever-receding highway nirvana, the Mid-Peninsula Transportation Corridor.

Mid-Penitentiary

The Mid-Pen, mainly a NAFTA trucking route, would start somewhere in Niagara at the Canada-US border, cut a wide arc around Hamilton (bypassing the sensitive Niagara growing regions), and join the tangle of 400-series highways somewhere between Hamilton and Burlington.

Formally proposed by the Harris provincial government, it stalled under the less dogmatic McGuinty government, whose heart just wasn't in a bitter fight with environmentalists and NIMBYs.

Former Hamilton Mayor Larry Di Ianni, desperate to see his dream of a colossal city of zones and expressways (Le Corbusier's Tower in a Park on a regional scale) come to fruition, led a delegation to Queen's Park earlier this year begging the Province to change its mind.

Proposed route of the mid-peninsula highway (Image Credit: COPE/NOMPH)
Proposed route of the mid-peninsula highway (Image Credit: COPE/NOMPH)

Imagine what the Mid-Pen would do once built: establish a new outer rim of the city, far from existing development, with interchange after interchange just waiting to be built into new subdivisions, strip plazas, and warehouse outlets.

Property speculators and developers would be delighted to snap up farmland and churn out pressboard-and-vinyl mchouses at exorbitant gains, unloading many of their costs onto city taxpayers.

A Fait Accompli

I recently had to drive to Mud St. and was shocked by its vast scale, surrounded by the backyards of huddled, squirming suburban houses and the half-empty parking lots of utilitarian plazas.

Mud St. at Paramount Dr. (Image Credit: Google Maps)
Mud St. at Paramount Dr. (Image Credit: Google Maps)

With the Red Hill Expressway a fait accompli, it's probably too late for the region around Mud St. short of a major retrofit (more on this in a future article). That damage is already done.

These new forms are a distillation of the suburban essence. They're pure sprawl, purged of any lingering, nostalgic notions of urban traditions.

The Logic of Sprawl

The logic of sprawl - low density, single-use buildings in single-use zones, commuting to destinations (rather than having destinations nearby) - is applied more fully during each iteration, largely in response to the problems of the previous iteration.

The suburb built 20 years ago is mired in traffic, so the new exurb needs even wider streets with bigger dividers and more lanes, turn lanes, and treatments that serve cars at the expense of pedestrians (try crossing a six- or eight-lane arterial road).

The commercial buildings are even bigger (reflecting the logistical trend away from stores and toward retail warehouses), so they need bigger parking lots, which further separates them from each other and from anything else.

Since the shopping centres are so ugly and hostile, they need to be separated further from residential zones via walls, embankments, berms, collectors, and so on.

Sprawl's Legacy Turns Inward

This is the legacy of a half-century of experiment with this built form: a city flying apart, consuming itself to spread farther and faster across the landscape in an inhuman wasteland of highways, vast parking lots, writhing housing crescents, and vile concrete boxes.

Into the gaping void left in the city's heart, the same purveyors of dreck seek to work their one-trick charms afresh, "renewing" industrial failures into more box stores and in the process wiping out the last few real neighbourhoods that managed to survive the upheaval until now.

Centre Mall is already reinventing itself as a big box block, hoping to attract suburban shoppers down the mountain, and Smart Centres just announced another retail warehouse metastasis at Centennial Parkway and the QEW.

Is there any hope for Ottawa Street, let alone embattled, historic Barton? Does anyone at City Hall care enough to yank back on the reins before we ride the misery-go-round yet again?

Ryan McGreal, the editor of Raise the Hammer, lives in Hamilton with his family and works as a programmer, writer and consultant. Ryan volunteers with Hamilton Light Rail, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. Ryan writes a city affairs column in Hamilton Magazine, and several of his articles have been published in the Hamilton Spectator. He also maintains a personal website and has been known to post passing thoughts on Twitter @RyanMcGreal. Recently, he took the plunge and finally joined Facebook.

10 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By jason (registered) | Posted December 04, 2006 at 15:06:57

not to be a downer (especially since it will be my generation paying the massive bills in the future) but I can't wait to see what happens to this style of development in 30 years. It won't be pretty, that's for sure.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Ziggy (anonymous) | Posted December 04, 2006 at 16:28:21

"an inhuman wasteland of highways, vast parking lots, writhing housing crescents, and vile concrete boxes." Someone's been reading Kunstler.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By A reader (anonymous) | Posted December 04, 2006 at 20:11:51

Don't care who he's been reading, what is going on at Hwy 5-6 and Rymal-Hwy 20 is stupid on a scale only the most rapacious developer could find rational or liveable. What is most stupid is that Council can't do the math to see how all this costs the taxpayer more than it will ever generate in taxes and revenues that stay in the city.

And then there's that pesky little question of where our children will get their food when trucking and flying it in from international sources is no longer affordable. Of course by that time, no one will be able to afford the mortgages on, or to heat and commute to, these McMonster cracker boxes. Then the city can seize the derelict hulks for backtaxes and level them for farms. We can only hope.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By adrian (registered) | Posted December 04, 2006 at 20:53:57

And the farmers - by now more like terraformers - will try to grow their crops on an infertile mixture of fast food wrappers, styrofoam packaging pellets and clearance tags.

These developments aren't just a blight on our environment, they sap vitality from the soul like fuzzy mold saps the goodness from an orange. It's as though our "leaders" are unsatisfied by our escape from nuclear annihilation so far and are insistent that we live in some sort of apocalyptic wasteland no matter what.

Maybe we should demolish City Hall and put up a Wal-Mart. City council can work as cashiers. If they're going to do Wal-Mart's bidding, they might as well get a wage for it.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By jason (registered) | Posted December 04, 2006 at 22:14:17

shhhh, "demolish city hall and put up a WalMart"?? C'mon, someone from the city might be reading this....they don't need anymore ideas.

I'll never forget the interview with one of the builders behind the Hwy 5&6 blob a couple years back....the question was asked to him - "will this project have a negative effect on downtown Waterdown or Dundas?" He said "Definitely. This will have a major impact, and it won't be good. But that's the city's role to take care of".
He's right on both counts.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By A reader (anonymous) | Posted December 05, 2006 at 00:21:04

"demolish city hall and put up a WalMart"??

Too late, most or our elected officials just function as greeters for the developers.

Ya want fries with that house?

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By highwater (registered) | Posted December 05, 2006 at 17:51:03

My nephew's an industrial designer and his girlfriend's an architect. I've been trying to convince them to implement my brilliant idea: biodegradable building materials for big box stores so we can just plow the bloody things under when they reach the inevitable end of their shelflives. Can't you just picture a thatch roof Walmart? So far all I've got are indulgent smiles and a pat on the head for my troubles.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By jason (registered) | Posted December 06, 2006 at 15:15:26

do they even need architects to design those buildings???
what a waste of schooling...all that hard work and creative design training only to spend day after day picking different colours of sheet metal to go on another square box.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By A reader (anonymous) | Posted December 06, 2006 at 17:10:35

And you think SOMEONE would have the smarts to realize making the shoppers cross two lanes of traffic to get to the store entrances are a hazard and an irritation??? Virtually every big mall location does this, for no intelligent reaon I can think of. Even though they have all the space in the world to have the main car flow far away from the building. Just shows what is more important, people or a layout that looks pretty on the drawing board.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Ryan (registered) - website | Posted December 06, 2006 at 22:24:09

This is one of the ironies of these buildings. They are surrounded by vast parking lots for the "convenience" of drivers, but after parking, the drivers then often have to walk the equivalent of a city block across an unpleasant, dangerous landscape to get to the store.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds