Raise the Hammer
By: Ryan McGreal
Published: 2007/10/02 (Category: Revitalization)
John Kernaghan's economic prescription in today's Spectator ('Short-term pain essential for city's long-term gain?', Oct. 2, 2007) is shockingly wrong-headed.
His first suggestion is for the city to "live without planned improvements to existing roads, sidewalks and other housekeeping so new roads and sewers can open up development lands."
If we're looking forward, can we please take a few minutes to think about the likely economic conditions we'll be dealing with?
Global oil production is currently at or very near an all time peak. Daily production has been stalled at around 84 million barrels for the past three years, despite oil prices that have quadrupled since 2000, and despite dramatic increases in exploration and drilling.
To think that tomorrow's growth economy can come from servicing greenfields around an airport several kilometres from the centre of town is simply delusional.
Even if the city should somehow manage to leverage a transportation mode with very poor long term prospects for economic spin-off development, the work would involve low wage, low value-add warehousing and logistics.
These are insecure, $10/hour jobs with minimal benefits, not exciting career prospects.
If Hamilton is to grow its economic base and attract new employers, we must do the following:
Leverage what we already have: an intact urban core with excellent shipping and rail connections, two post-secondary institutions, and abundant development lands that are already serviced but underused and in need of remediation.
Exploit future growth areas: in a landmark report to City Council [PDF], energy consultant Richard Gilbert recommended making energy policy Hamilton's Plan A, cultivating new industries around production, conservation (especially retrofits), and electric transit.
Make city business simple and transparent: Hamilton is too-well known for labyrinthine, politicized regulations and backroom deals. We'll attract more high quality entrepreneurs and employers once we build open, straightforward business policies.
Aim higher: we should seek high value-add, highly skilled careers for tomorrow, not dead-end service jobs in the middle of nowhere.
The Farther Out model of development has run its course. Between rising energy costs, climate change, and escalating gridlock in car-dependent suburbs, smart cities are looking inward - and upward - toward a rich future of dense, vibrant urban development that provides a healthy business climate and an excellent quality of life.
That future does not exist in warehouses surrounded by asphalt next to an airport.
I'm going to give John Kernaghan the benefit of the doubt and suggest he wrote the entire article with his tongue planted firmly in his cheek. How else to explain the hilarity of this throwaway line:
"Toronto-area industrial realtors are waiting for land to open up as many GTA businesses look to move down the QEW corridor and escape gridlock..."
Comedy gold.
these guys must think we're idiots.
This wasn't all that long ago:
http://www.raisethehammer.org/index.asp?id=208
The stars and the moon and the earth and the sun are aligning here." -- Mayor Fred Eisenberger on Light Rail in Hamilton
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Civic Monument or Big Box: Your Call (Oct. 10, 2008) - Mayor Fred has posted a survey on his website asking for public input on how to proceed with the renovations of city hall.
Go check it out and make your opinion count.
For those who don't
Sad But Funny (Oct. 9, 2008) - We'll need to file this one in the 'sad but funny' file at RTH - Toronto City Council voted on Tuesday to name their newest North York street, 'OMB Folly'.
This after the OM
Letter to Council: City Hall Deserves Better (Oct. 6, 2008) - Dear Mayor and Members of Council,
I've been following the ongoing discussions regarding the renovations of Hamilton City Hall.
As a resident and taxpayer in Hamilton, I certainly apprec
Authoritarianism Meets Stylishness (Oct. 6, 2008) - A couple of interesting articles in this weekend's Toronto Star. First off there's Thomas Walkhom's analysis of free market economics versus 'authoritarian capitalism'. Citing
Mayor: 'Stars Aligning' for Light Rail, Gore Plaza Moving Forward (Oct. 3, 2008) - I spoke this morning with Mayor Fred Eisenberger about light rail, economic development and the Gore Master Plan Study. He was understandably excited about the gathering momentum on light rail in
Sooner or Loiter (Oct. 3, 2008) -
An article in today's Spectator about the city's plan to revitalize Gore Park confused me:
Vendors. Entertainment. A peace memorial. Less loitering. A friendlier climate.
V
By umm....
Posted 10/2/2007 4:43:12 PM
That's funny. We have already been delaying improvements to roads and sewers so that we could open up new development lands for DeSantis and all the other buddies of city council.
What was the Meadowlands for? What about the Red Hill Parkway? What about the Linc?
Where has it gotten us? Are we better yet? Where's our budget surplus from all the fancy new property taxes we were supposed to get from all this development?
Can we stop now and try to rebuild our roads?
(Permalink)