By: Ted Mitchell
Published: 2008/01/21 (Category: Policy)
(Published as a letter to the editor in the Hamilton Spectator on Jan 21, 2008.)
In his Jan. 16 column ("Will 'kids only' ER trouble the adults?") column, Andrew Dreschel drew attention to some but missed many negative consequences of the Hamilton Health Sciences' changes proposed for medical care in Hamilton.
Most significant is the absence of input from the community and front-line physicians. So far, local media have mostly accepted the spin supplied by administration without inquiring about potential setbacks in the delivery of medical care.
Patients seldom present with clear single-system pathology, hence the current emphasis on subspecialty care is inherently flawed. An integrated, multisystem approach to patient care in which generalists and specialists work together has always been regarded as more desirable and affordable than the model offered by HHS.
As more generalists are squeezed out of the hospital environment in favour of "centres of excellence," patients lose continuity of care and are treated less like people and more like consumers.
Any adult suffering from a life-threatening illness in West Hamilton, Dundas and Ancaster will be forced to drive past a functional ER and will not be served well by the proposal.
The last thing this city needs is more vehicle travel and ambulance trips ferrying patients from one specialized site to the other, as is necessary to meet the needs of multisystem ailments that are becoming the norm in an aging population.
With this proposal, McMaster health-care students lose a world-class adult teaching hospital on their doorstep, and well-considered links to clinical and basic science buildings will be severed.
Non-administrative members of McMaster's health-care team would probably have countless more concerns if they were asked, and anyone was listening.
I too was wondering about this when I heard the news from HHS last week.
All residents in Upper and Lower Hamilton west of the 403 and all thos in Dundas/Ancaster/Waterdown/Flamborough will need to come downtown to St Joes or the General for ER needs.
Doesn't sound very practical, or safe, to me.
I wonder if both uses could be housed at Mac?
The problem with thinking locally in this case is that Hamilton is a regional referral centre for Niagara falls to brantford to halton. General hospitals are the norm in the periphery but the move toward specialized centres in major cities is a trend that goes far beyond HHS.
Amen,I just had this conversation with a Doctor at the HHS last night.
ISSN: 1715-1554
Aerotropolis: Will It Fly? - Wednesday, December 3, 2008, at Mount Hope Community Hall, 3027 Homestead Dr., Mount Hope.
Can Harper Prorogue Parliament? (Dec. 3, 2008) - Given the paucity of Prime Minister Stephen Harpers options as Monday's confidence vote draws closer, pundits and analysts are coalescing around the conclusion that he will ask Governor Genera
Picking a Prime Minister: A Parliamentary Primer (Dec. 2, 2008) -
We will use all legal means to resist this undemocratic seizure of power.
-- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
With the Liberals and NDP agreeing to a coalition with the support of the B
Bratina: City Hall Plan Could Save $110 Million Over 20 Years (Dec. 2, 2008) - Councillor Bob Bratina, who has proposed that the City remain at Hamilton City Centre, is claiming that this move will cost only $50 million over the next 20 years, compared to $150 million to com
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) - Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Same Old 'Traffic Trumps Everything' Thinking (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Apparently, the City Traffic department still doesn't get it.
After turning James and John into two-way streets that slowed traffic down, the city is now looking for ways to speed thing
Toronto Council to Vote on Corporate, Union Donations (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Toronto City Council has another opportunity today to decide whether to allow corporate and union donations to be proffered during municipal campaigns.
City Council has voted against such don
By Medic
Posted 1/21/2008 8:49:49 AM
Dr. Ted...puleeeeez. Climb down that high horse or you'll need nosebleed attention.
(Permalink)