Comment 106082

By Crispy (registered) | Posted November 09, 2014 at 19:48:36 in reply to Comment 106075

Ryan allow me to cherry pick once again. Sean Burak provides an ad hoc potential tax value of the King-Kenilworth area and your response is: "Sean, this deserves to be an article in itself! Fantastic work!" I provide an ad hoc calculation that supports the city engineer and opposes your view and your response is to completely ignore it.

Speaking of Burak he stated: "I visit this intersection daily and I am sure that no homes would have to be removed." Really?? Based on what?? He provided nothing to support this. He made an assumption without evidence which completely goes against the RTH user agreement: "Finally, let the evidence lead your investigations and let your conscience guide your responses. Remember the Benny Hill Rule: When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME." Did you question Burak about it? Did you ask for any kind of back up? No! In fact since both of you clearly disagree with the city engineer why didn't you (or Burak) follow up with him for clarification?

It makes me wonder if you have a personal beef with Mr. Moore.

The "About Raise the Hammer" section states: "We are non-partisan..." and "Raise the Hammer is dedicated to providing a variety of views..."

I don't believe these two statements at all.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds