Comment 114615

By mdrejhon (registered) - website | Posted November 04, 2015 at 13:59:57 in reply to Comment 114609

TL;DR: Raise a motion that major transit/safety/flooding upgrades be a mandatory condition of the widening fund. As an alternative response if simply saying "no" is difficult.

It'll end up doing the same thing (because of being too expensive, while having fewer angry Mountain residents than the "say no" technique); or actually achieve the goal successfully (we get major transit/safety/flooding upgrades too as a compromise).

By bringing this in, it gives a good opportunity to discuss/highlight the side costs of widening, and there exists many Mountain residents, including friends, that are understanding of these (or willing to hear this out).

Comment edited by mdrejhon on 2015-11-04 15:11:50

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds