There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Jim (anonymous) | Posted November 27, 2008 at 12:09:14
Please understand the H2SiF6 is a very different chemical and complex blend of radioactive contaminates. It was admitted again in congressional investigations 2000 Calvert by Charles Fox EPA that not a single study for chronic use have ever been done for health and benefit. This produce is b703-06 AWWA standard but No government agency actually tests it but NSF a non government does. The products tested for the thousands of studies are very purified sodium fluoride in double distilled deionized water. Far from real life because all water differ and often greatly in calcium ,magnesium and a long list of potential contaminates which fluoride is under law.
The FDA sort of grandfathered in under claims of being used prior to 1938 but under questing did admit no human uses could be found but did admit effective rat killer. FDA reply to Sally Stride. John Kelly congressman NJ waited 2 years for the FDA to admit they misinformed him and that fluoride was a new unapproved for ingestion with no review or approval ever.
There is a excuse for ignorance but please try to get at least one fact right next time. Dr Mitchell might be a nice guy but he is ignores the massive amount of data showing proof of fluoride damage at levels close to those many recieve in fluoridated cities. Most doctors think it wise to control dose and make it dependant upon personal health and situation. Most cities unfluoridated in the US have more then 10% with dental fluorosis which the theory was would not exceed 10% at 1ppm which would give a child 1mg per day. One brushing with big glob of fluoridated toothpaste can easly exceed that for most young kids as the youngest swallow half even when they do not try to. Many try to because of very tasty blends. 1000ppm toothpaste in a small pea sized dab is 1/4mg or the same as 1 cup 8 oz water at 1ppm. Most young kids get more fluoride then a professional could prescribe many times over. Is this logical or control. See Featherstone 2000 who with other researchers can not find any ingested benefit of fluoride or relationship of fluoride in enamel to cavity reduction or acid resistance. That was a theory that took on a life of its own with out proof of a mechanism of action. Lots of poorly controlled studies. If you get to pick the teams and the refs you control the results in any game. The foundation of fluoridation is junk science from short bias design studies that did not look beyond delayed eruption benefits and no control of examiner variability which is often bigger then the claimed result. Thus meaningless unless controlled.
Permalink | Context