-
Yes We Cannon!
Join the Movement and Spread the Word
Recent Articles
- We Need to Remember the Case for LRTby Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (4 comments)
- The Benefits of Urban Chicken and Bee Pilot Projects at Community Gardensby Joseph Sneep, published May 18, 2013 in Commentary (11 comments)
- Public Works Committee Rejects Bus Lane Pilot Projectby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (31 comments)
- Focus on Cycling Infrastructure Before Enforcementby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (5 comments)
- Baranga's On the Beach: This Ain't No Beach-Side Hutby Margaret Lindsay Holton, published May 16, 2013 in Reviews (11 comments)
- NYC Redesigns its Streets for Safety, Vitality and Diverse Useby Ryan McGreal, published May 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Ghost Crosswalks Haunt Hamilton Intersectionsby Undustrial, published May 12, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Public Meeting with New Horizon Regarding City Square Phase 3by Kelly Foyle and Simon Kiss, published May 12, 2013 in Commentary (10 comments)
- Yes We Cannon - Bike Lanes 2015by Justin Jones, published May 10, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (29 comments)
- City Crackdown on Tactical Urbanismby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Special Report (121 comments)
- Invigorating Tactical Urbanism Talk Inspires Actionby Ryan McGreal, published May 08, 2013 in Events (17 comments)
- Durand Neighbourhood 'Betrayed' By New Horizon Rezoning Applicationby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 08, 2013 in Commentary (41 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- Mental Health for a diverse Hamilton - May 23, 2013, at Crowne Plaza Hotel, 150 King Street East
- 16 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- A Trip Down Highway 6by Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Transportation (12 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Struck at Upper Gage and Mohawkby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Transportation (6 comments)
- Still Struggling to Make Sense of City Policy on Crosswalksby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 14, 2013 in Transportation (13 comments)
- Tactical Urbanism and the Judgment of Hart Solomonby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 13, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- A Poem in Julyby Shekar Chandrashekar, published May 12, 2013 in Arts (1 comment)
- Tactical Urbanism Crackdown in Spacingby Ryan McGreal, published May 10, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Hamilton Sustainability Professionals Network Launch Eventby Justin Jones, published May 09, 2013 in Sustainability (0 comments)
- 20 Jackson Demolition Rumour is Just a Rumour - For Nowby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Revitalization (11 comments)
- Staircase Minor Variance Application to Waive Parking Requirementby RTH Staff, published May 08, 2013 in Activism (4 comments)
- Merulla Motion Calls for Integrity Commissioner to Investigate Mayor Bratinaby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Politics (8 comments)
- Letter: In Defence of Ontario Port Landsby Letter to the Editor, published May 07, 2013 in Revitalization (0 comments)
- Mayor Bratina Recuses Himself from Mayors' Vote on Big Move Revenue Toolsby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Light Rail (4 comments)
Blog Archives
By kevlahan (registered)
Posted May 23, 2009 at 13:15:40
The double standard regarding enforcement was illustrated perfectly just this week.
Police in Halton were trying to catch speeders by making their cars look less conspicuous (they put a taxi-like light on the roof, which actually said 'police'). The (motoring) public were outraged by the 'unfairness'of this particular enforcement technique.
Apparently, the majority of motorists believe that disobeying the posted speed should normally be allowed! One common objection was that motorists would be forced to drive the legal speed whenever they saw a taxi (presumably this was the entire point of the exercise!).
The response of police was ... to discontinue this particularly effective form of enforcement!
A similar thing happened when they reduced the speed limit on Cootes drive near a very busy pedestrian crossing at McMaster to improve safety for the large numbers of pedestrians who cross there. When police noticed that most motorists ignored the speed limit they ... increased it again (instead of enforcing it!).
However, when it comes to pedestrians and cyclists the general attitude seems to be that their infractions are outrageous and they need to be reigned in.
This response is probably mostly tribal: motorists understand and accept the behaviour of those like them ("of course one rolls through stops, burns amber lights and speeds ..."), but not that of the 'other' ("why do cyclists and pedestrians think they can disobey the rules?").
Since motorists are seen as the 'normal' road users (and are usually in the majority here in Hamilton), the police acquiesce to their notions of what is fair, but clamp down on the others.
As mentioned previously in RTH, this whole attitude to enforcement ignores the fact that it is actually motoring infractions which have the greatest potential to cause harm. A rational enforcement policy would be to "minimize the maximum risk", not "minimize annoyance to motorists".
As Ryan pointed out the best enforcement is to design roads to encourage the desired behaviour ...
Reply | Permalink | Context