Comment 45118

By highwater (registered) | Posted August 07, 2010 at 22:30:23

He affirms this blinkered view of 'anchor tenant' in the next paragraph, where he again assumes this equals Ticats. Then it was his passing of this misinterpretation along to the Provincial government that led to yesterday's shocker.

The Feds have only said that they will honour Hostco's choice of location, not the city's, so blinker boy can still force the EM site.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds