Comment 45570

By lawrence (registered) - website | Posted August 12, 2010 at 16:31:26

Thanks for that Robbie. Nothing to appologise for. You could probably explain what you are talking about a 100 times and it still makes not sense how they get to these types of conclusions or where they get these numbers from.

I talked to the Cats about Ivor Wynne and they said it was going to cost $93 million to fix her up. Why does a city report say $16m? Why do the engineers say she'll last another 45 years? One poster on the Tiger-Cat forums, highlighted that CN Tower is only 5 years newer than the south stands at Ivor Wynne and it will last another 100 years.

Parking isn't an issue at Ivor Wynne so why do we need 6,000 spots on the mountain and why is parking an issue at West Harbour and why do we really need a new stadium then if parking isn't an issue. Its all a big circle.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds