Comment 48758

By Paul (registered) | Posted October 04, 2010 at 15:32:13

It may seem not to make sense for someone who completely ignored everything written above but it is not that complicated. The island is not being submerged to benefit fish but to destroy cormorant habitat. People find this wrong. Is it straight now?

There is no need to sacrifice one for the other. Fish habitat can be created without losing bird habitat. Any clearer?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds