Comment 56094

By realfreeenterpriser (registered) | Posted January 12, 2011 at 22:20:35

This should be easy. Establish the cost to taxpayers of a scalable stadium at the West Harbour then establish the cost to taxpayers of a renovated Ivor Wynne as proposed by the Tiger-Cats and any accompanying subsidies, sweetheart deals and management fees contained in the, as yet undisclosed, 20 year lease. If the former costs less than the latter Council has an obligation to demand that the Tiger-Cats pony up the difference just like any private business would be expected to do.

Both proposals are on publicly-owned land, both appear to get Hamilton into the Pan-American games, neither will pay taxes, so the only real difference is cost.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds