There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Mahesh_P_Butani (registered) - website | Posted February 18, 2011 at 11:17:25 in reply to Comment 59822
Well Zot, I am no scholar either, but I’ll try and give it a shot!
The Republic is a fictional dialogue between Plato's teacher - Socrates, and Plato's brother Glaucon. Possibly one of the grandest of 'aporetic' gestures, Plato’s -dialogues of refutation– has the speaker pose doubts about questions signifying 'insoluble contradiction' ~ ('a paradox in a text's meanings').
The main arguments of this work are about justice and happiness. And at the end of Book 1, Plato has Socrates pondering: "...not knowing what justice is, one can hardly know whether it is a virtue; nor whether its possessor is happy."
'Aporia' as a device was used by Plato most effectively to search for higher truths. Rather than deliver instant packaged truths that many seek in our times – he left an approach for discovery by subsequent seeker of truths which formed the very basis of dialectics.
Many scholars respecting his process of arriving at truth via ambiguity - call him a ‘wise’ guy. While there are many more, who take deep offense at the contradictions arising from his process of seeking truth-and not finding well packaged propositions at the end of his inquiry-end up calling him a ‘wise-guy’ :)
His writings have allowed discerning readers over centuries to think for themselves, and apply his process to draw meaning for their time and context. His works continue to remain under-construction, awaiting fresh participation from successive generations to complete the grand search for truths he initiated.
... “Then you must not insist on my proving that the actual State will in every respect coincide with the ideal: if we are only able to discover how a city may be governed nearly as we proposed, you will admit that we have discovered the possibility which you demand; and will be contented. I am sure that I should be contented --will not you? ” ... “Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, and political greatness and wisdom meet in one, and those commoner natures who pursue either to the exclusion of the other are compelled to stand aside, cities will never have rest from their evils, --nor the human race, as I believe, --and then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the light of day. Such was the thought, my dear Glaucon, which I would fain have uttered if it had not seemed too extravagant; for to be convinced that in no other State can there be happiness private or public is indeed a hard thing”. ...
So, if Undustrial's "invisible man writes a paragraph on your whiteboard at a meeting" -- Does he feel 'just' about his need to be invisible? and was he 'happy' about taking the silverware on his way out - as payment for having made a point, or for thrills, from being invisible?
Or, were he not invisible, and chose to participate in the meeting to make a point - and then picked the silverware on his way out, would he still be happy?
... "The origin of the evil is that all men from the beginning, heroes, poets, instructors of youth, have always asserted "the temporal dispensation," the honours and profits of justice. Had we been taught in early youth the power of justice and injustice inherent in the soul, and unseen by any human or divine eye, we should not have needed others to be our guardians, but every one would have been the guardian of himself. This is what I want you to show, Socrates;--other men use arguments which rather tend to strengthen the position of Thrasymachus that "might is right;" but from you I expect better things. And please, as Glaucon said, to exclude reputation; let the just be thought unjust and the unjust just, and do you still prove to us the superiority of justice." ...
Comment edited by Mahesh_P_Butani on 2011-02-18 11:21:30
Metropolitan Hamilton
Hamilton Reporter
Permalink | Context