Comment 6749

By rusty (registered) - website | Posted May 25, 2007 at 11:24:55

That's right. It's not about either or. It's about both.

How successful is a middle class suburb with nothing but detatched homes? How does this separation of income levels improve the overall health of our community? Similarly, how does a segregated affordable housing enclave improve our community? It doesn't. People respond to their environment and if their environment is nothing but white well-fed faces and leaf blowers, or drug deals on every corner, then nothing much will change.

Separating different types of housing is not beneficial for the overall community. What you need to do is create the right mix. This can be a very delicate balance - you don't want a huge homeless shelter thrown into the middle of a middle class sub division. Neither do you want a single 4 bedroom halfway stuck in the middle of a Forest Hill or Bridal Path - you have to get the mix right so that everyone feels that they belong, and everyone feels safe.

Good examples are Esplanade and Roncesvalles in TO (and the soon to be redevloped Regents Park), in Hamilton I would look at Locke Street (north of Aberdeen) and the neighbourhoods turning around along James north. It's a shame there are so few good examples.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds