Comment 72216

By mathemagician? (anonymous) | Posted December 13, 2011 at 12:42:02 in reply to Comment 72200

This column is getting too skinny!

No it doesn't leave 85%, you can't take such a simplistic approach to that number. If you want to use numbers like that then you have to dig into the actual passenger miles travelled. distance matters. Additionally you have to consider non-commuter trips - week-ending at the cottage 4 hours away for example. And if we really want to get into the nitty gritty, we need to know about tax breaks given to anything related to the automotive and road construction industries, not to mention the burden on local taxpayers to support the sprawling land use model that car use promotes and requires. What about property taxes lost on land used for parking (either public or private)?

All of these burdens on the general tax add to the car subsidy. YOur calculation is an impossible best case scenario. And even that does show a subsidy (though you seem to think it's too small to matter).

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds