Comment 72853

By H+H (registered) - website | Posted January 09, 2012 at 12:24:49

With all due respect, this debate is as much about what Bob chose to write about (and how he wrote about it) as it is about what he chose not to include. I realize that it would have been inappropriate for him to have written 5,000 words in response to the vision question, but the manipulative text he did submit is what has caused people to comment in, clearly what seems to some to be, a harsh and critical manner.

The so-called "catch-phrase" to which Bob refers (Best place to raise a child), is one quarter of our city's Vision statement. Whether we love the statement or not, it is the Vision we are all supposedly committed to achieving. If it's not the right vision, then let's change it. Catch phrases, slogans, etc. are for ad campaigns, not touchstones to assist people in making critical decisions and in developing inspiring plans.

I know when I'm being pandered to. When you have declared yourself to be incapable of learning (I would change nothing), it's a little difficult for me to listen to treacly nostalgia, especially when it's written so poorly. Of course we don't want to destroy our agricultural land. Of course we love children, rich and poor alike. Of course animals, and pumpkin patches and horsey rides are all cute. I'm looking for a sense that our mayor has a grasp of issues and opportunities and a vision for where Hamilton not only can go, but needs to go in the future. I expect him to be able to articulate, inspire us towards, and help us realize that vision. If his current writings are working for you, please stay engaged and help make it happen. As for me, I like my visions a little more compelling and my leaders a little more capable.

gcrawford

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds