Comment 75019

By MattJelly (registered) - website | Posted March 05, 2012 at 11:14:23 in reply to Comment 75004

These subsidies exist for Public Health no matter where they locate- it's a standard 75/25 cost sharing arrangement. If the Mac project doesn't happen, the $18.4 Million would still go towards Public Health's eventual accommodation. It's unfortunate that this wasn't clarified months ago when Council was first considering its commitment to the deal.

The timing is very odd- staff decides to clarify this at the 11th hour?

It's not "sweetening the pot"- we own both the pot and the sweetener in this case.

Comment edited by MattJelly on 2012-03-05 11:14:45

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds