There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By H+H (registered) - website | Posted June 02, 2012 at 09:39:33
downtowninhamilton
Just by way of trying to respond to some of your concerns....
Two lanes both ways is the first of the suggestions in Adrian's piece. I can't see why that wouldn't work. I realize we have to consider curb side parking given that we want to promote healthy retail and that does present a design challenge, but not an insurmountable one as far as I'm concerned. Hours allowed for street parking on one side of the street only is one solution, just as it's done now on Cannon.
There are many main streets on the mountain that do not have left-hand turning lanes, especially in the "older" neighbourhoods. Some do, of course like main intersections of Upper James (but most side streets of which there are many do not), but some don't like Upper Gage, Upper Ottawa, most of Fennel. Advance green is always a possibility. In fact, I would say it would be a requirement.
I'm not a horticulturist, but I know that the Plane tree (aka Sycamore) is an ideal city tree. They are the trees that are on the west side of our City Hall plaza. They are also the favoured tree along streets in Paris. They can be trimmed high as they grow, so while initially, they may obscure a sign or two, as they grow they provide a shade canopy for the street. They can live for several hundred years. As is the case in the proposed rendering, the trees provide a wonderful visual addition and lushness to the street. Perhaps we'll need to think of a tall tree that has a smaller diameter trunk, just so long as we don't put up the small junk trees that City Hall seems to prefer. We end up compromising so much that we end up with crap instead of an urban forest. Just like we end up with fields that the City labels "parks" because they're easier to cut, and have effectively no other maintenance because there is literally nothing else in them. I don't want third rate. You plant great trees once, not every year. You trim them every few years. They last generations.
I don't pretend to have this thing all figured out, but I do have to say that I'm struck by the concerns about backups that would lead to people not venturing downtown. Really? How is it that people can handle all the backups on the mountain streets like Mohawk and Fennel and Upper James on their way to work and back? Somehow people cope. Even with these backups, they still go about their lives up there. Surely we should be permitted to do the same downtown.
As I've said before, Dennis Vranich has proven to us with the barriers in front of his abandoned building at King and Hess that we can do without an entire lane on King St. West for what has now been well over a year and with no end in site since there has been zero activity on the site. Somehow we're coping. Wonder what our traffic engineers have to say about that fact?
gcrawford
Permalink | Context