Comment 85749

By Chris Angel (registered) | Posted February 01, 2013 at 21:35:45 in reply to Comment 85746

That is hilarious, exactly what are GS's photos proof of? Am I forgetting that he is an accredited professional of some sort who is so succinct that his one line toss off's are pearls of wisdom? No he is not qualified to dismiss the work of industry professionals with that series of photos or anything he has uttered attached to them or otherwise.

"Here, see for your self how my selected images represent the whole". Anyone who has been in that school in the last twenty years who has several years of relevant construction experience knows otherwise.

Don't take my word for it if you or anyone else thinks his photos show evidence of anything but Santucci's ignorance or mendacity, go right ahead represent them as an expose. You and he will be laughing stocks.

He only reluctantly provided a link to the inspection documents he claims are incorrect. He discourages readers from them by offering to filter all their "anecdotal lab reports" and "anecdotal assessments" by qualified professionals into a distillation of his own.

I would advise anyone who really wants to know the truth about the condition of this building to read the reports themselves rather than have GS do their thinking for them. Personally I just can not abide this campaign of disinformation regardless of it's intent.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds