Comment 86318

By alhambra (anonymous) | Posted February 14, 2013 at 15:07:07 in reply to Comment 86300

I think you're missing the point. They signed a contract to run venues. They are suggesting the contract was incumbent on no casino. That might or might not be a good argument but they're not holding the city hostage to any degree. It's no different than any business would do if they buy an operation in expectation of certain conditions being in place.

There is no comparison to the Ticats because that was funded largely by public moneys.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds