Comment 87593

By Fred Street (anonymous) | Posted March 31, 2013 at 15:54:58 in reply to Comment 87591

Despite the Transportation Master Plan's talk of offering "a choice of integrated travel modes, emphasizing active transportation (walking and cycling), public transit and carpooling," the City seems to favour new infrastructure construction over rehab projects, and city-wide (or, in the case of the Trinity corridor, regional) benefits over neighbourhood-level concerns. That political calculus might be more complicated in the case of something like the Trinity corridor and Glanbrook Industrial Park as planning on those date seems to back to pre-amalgamation. The question is, how do we overcome this apparent bias? Do neighbourhood-level concerns simply rise or fall based on the political acumen of ward councillors?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds