There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By kevlahan (registered) | Posted January 11, 2014 at 12:27:00 in reply to Comment 96680
This population density issue keeps coming up over and over on RTH and is often used as just another irrelevant 'exceptionalism' excuse not to adopt a proven urban design principle here (Hamilton is too cold/hot, has an escarpment/lake, is close to Toronto, is not European, is too poor, too old/new, too diverse/homogeneous for something that works somewhere else to work here).
The Spec was guilty of this "but we're different" excuse recently when they argued that the city should not extend sidewalk clearing to all parts of the city because "we are not London, Ottawa or Winnipeg." I'm not sure why the fact that these other Canadian cities, of similar size, provide snow clearing of sidewalks is not relevant. Is it because they have more snow, and so snow clearing would be cheaper here? http://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/430...
It is true that population density is sometimes a relevant factor. However, it is not reasonable to argue against 30km/h conversion in Durand or Kirkendall (or widened sidewalks or two-way conversion) by invoking density based on the entire area of the city which, due to amalgamation, has huge tracts of agricultural and rural land. The fair thing to do is consider either the density of the urban areas (about 2200 residents /km^2) or, even better, the densities of the actual areas being discussed.
Ward 2 has a very high population density of 6800 /km^2, and Durand is even higher at about 12000 /km^2. These densities are extremely high by any standards. For comparison, the English district with the highest density in the entire country is the North London borough of Islington, with a density of 14000/km^2 and area of 14.86 km^2 (Ward 2 has an area of 4.7km^2), and only 9 districts have population densities higher than 10000 /km^2! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Eng...
Even by "European" standards the urban core of Hamilton has high population densities, certainly high enough to warrant "people first" planning principles!
Comment edited by kevlahan on 2014-01-11 12:44:46
Permalink | Context