Comment 98154

By RobF (registered) | Posted March 03, 2014 at 13:52:20 in reply to Comment 98146

I find it ironic that this is the argument that the Toronto Environmental Alliance (TEA) and other LRT advocates used to support Transit City over subway expansion. Except in Toronto, of course, the argument was that you could build several LRT lines for the cost extending the Sheppard Subway to the Scarborough Town Centre and thru to Kennedy Station.

As has been stated by others the argument for LRT instead of BRT is more complex than just how much can be built for a given amount of money. The King-Main Corridor in the lower city is different than Upper James or Mohawk in terms of potential ridership and redevelopment. LRT on King-Main addresses multiple objectives: it improves reliability and speed (if implemented properly); can handle ridership growth; has lower operating costs (per rider); and has greater potential to spur mixed-use intensification along its corridors. BRT on King-Main would address the first point, but not the others ... and the existing B-line already runs full during peak hours.

Comment edited by RobF on 2014-03-03 13:53:55

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds