If we always do what we've always done, we'll always get what we've always got.
By Trevor Shaw
Oct. 22, 2007
Recently Mayor Eisenberger suggested that a small stretch of King Street (Gore Park) be turned into a pedestrian plaze. Bizarrely, this suggestion generated some resistance, even from the director of the downtown BIA.
City planning in Hamilton and largely across North America for the past 50 years has focused on private land use.
The city staff members and councils have micro-managed how a landowner can build, what gets built, the use of the land and its buildings and neglected the places that the public occupies. This has been a double-edged sword for city life.
Currently city by-laws and zoning rules stand in the way of a land developer to mix residential, commercial and entertainment uses. The City forces a minimum amount of parking spaces, maximum heights on buildings, minimum setbacks (how far a building must be from the street), and usage.
Ultimately this destroys pedestrian use and makes automobiles necessary to participate in day-to-day civic life.
Sparks Street, Ottawa
The long-time zoning rules have forced developers into making their lots be used for one purpose only. That is, single unit housing, multiple housing, office, entertainment, commercial, or industrial uses.
Forcing a building or lot of land into a single-function-use is not natural to how people live and function in an urban area. It has segregated the citizens and not allowed a city to naturally grow and evolve into vibrant clusters where people can live, work, shop, and socialize.
An article by Andrew Dreschel in the Hamilton Spectator suggested that people would not stroll a Gore Park promenade because they can socialize and shop at Limeridge Mall. The problem is that Limeridge Mall is private property. One can be evicted for a loosely defined infraction such as 'loitering'.
Public spaces are vital to a community. Gore Park has historically been the place that Hamiltonians visited to celebrate and protest. This couldn't happen at a mall or big box centre that is privately owned.
Hamiltonians took to the streets (Gore Park included) and celebrated Victory in Europe (VE Day) in 1945
Most of the livable places in the city would be illegal to build today.
Granted, the city is taking small steps forward. Some downtown developments are being built to the street, two-way streets, on-street parking, wide sidewalks.
But the rest of the city continue with the same car dependent environment with huge surface parking lots, five or more lanes of fast moving traffic, and buildings set so far back from the street that they require signs at the street to let people know what's at the back of the parking lot.
Parks, plazas, squares; boulevards and streets with wide sidewalks next to calm vehicle traffic add much to a city's livable factor. People experience a city through the public realm.
If it's a hostile environment, people won't bother using the space. That means the space has to be more than just a space. The space has to have a reason and a function.
Even some city parks don't function very well. Everyone wants them, wants to live near them, but they aren't used very much.
Why? Because there isn't much reason to go them, and if you do, they often lack washroom facilities, picnic facilities, most are barren grass fields, kept green with chemicals, and few trees.
A pedestrian street in Montreal
A pedestrianized Gore Park plaza would meet the requirements of a useful public space – with the addition of public washrooms, something that used to be in Gore Park. It would be a destination, have a reason, and be a friendly place to socialize.
This will take a change of thinking from our city planners, but it is the right direction. If we always do what we've always done, we'll always get what we've always got.
By peter
Posted 10/24/2007 4:39:50 PM
^ummmmm, what's your point again?
get outta your car a walk around a bit. you might like what you see. but then again, probably not.
By jason
Posted 10/25/2007 1:25:59 PM
I saw Kathy Drewitt walking through Gore Park today. I wanted to go chat, but thought better of it.
I should have started yelling and screaming about the lack of parking down there.
"how the heck am I supposed to go to the pawn shop and cheque cashing store if there's no mega parking lot at Gore??"
By V
Posted 10/26/2007 11:15:40 AM
I live in Downtown Hamilton, a few blocks from Gore Park. My office is a few blocks the other side of Gore Park.
I love living and working here and I would love to see this type of setup.
But (and you know there was going to be a "but") there is no way this will happen until the city and the police take care of the problems.
I have lived here 9 years and I have never been bothered by truly homeless or in-need people. The dregs and yes I mean dregs are the problem.
Open drug deals in the trees at Hughson & King, the constant littering, spitting, badgering of people is constantly going on.
The police watch this and do nothing.
There are laws....apply them HARSHLY.
By V
Posted 10/26/2007 11:43:13 AM
I live in Downtown Hamilton, a few blocks from Gore Park. My office is a few blocks the other side of Gore Park.
I love living and working here and I would love to see this type of setup.
But (and you know there was going to be a "but") there is no way this will happen until the city and the police take care of the problems.
I have lived here 9 years and I have never been bothered by truly homeless or in-need people. The dregs and yes I mean dregs are the problem.
Open drug deals in the trees at Hughson & King, the constant littering, spitting, badgering of people is constantly going on.
The police watch this and do nothing.
There are laws....apply them HARSHLY.
By fanc3
Posted 10/26/2007 5:23:26 PM
Sparks Street Mall has been a complete bust over the past 15-20 years. The NCC has tried to rejuvenate the mall by building sculptures, luring upscale retailers, etc, but has failed miserably. The entire street is deserted past 4pm when all the federal employees who work in the buildings flanking both sides of the street go home. This may be due to the absence of a nearby residential area since Sparks cuts through the financial/govt building district. The nearest "happening" area is Elgin Street (which is 2-way)- it's packed full with residential units, small shops, bakeries, cafes, pubs, a school, public park, etc. so there's no reason for Elgin streeters to go over to Sparks.
However, with the construction of new residential/mixed use buildings in the downtown core, a pedestrian street mall may work for Gore Park.
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 10/26/2007 10:04:49 PM
I think you hit the nail on the head with this observation: "The entire street is deserted past 4pm when all the federal employees who work in the buildings flanking both sides of the street go home."
The biggest problem with Sparks Street is the lack of mixed uses adjacent to it. SIngle use development produces one-way flows of people and long stretches when no one is around. That's antithetical to a healthy urban environment.
By Cal DiFalco
Posted 11/6/2007 2:06:15 PM
First, I applaud the Mayor for thinking outside the box and considering pedestrian malls. The importance, in my view, is not so much the actual solution he is proposing, but the signal that he recognizes the importance of the core and that it must be people friendly and environmentally friendly.
I am a Transformation Director by trade. What I do is help large organizations transform from one state a being, to another desired state. Transformation is not about tweaking; it's about wholesale change.
The key to successful transformation is leadership, alignment and staging. Too often, people have good ideas but lack the alignment necessary to bring them to fruition. Other times, leadership is there, alignment is in a ready state, but the translation from vision to implementation is left to chance.
This is where you need someone who is skilled in carving out the engines of transformation; the core levers that get us to where we want to go. Then carefully staging plans and executing them to incrementally get us there. Along the way, recognizing resistance and mitigating it.
Until we have decomposed our vision into tangible interventions with accountable bodies, we are just spinning.
Is it difficult in an environment where councillors have a dual responsibility to their constituents and to the city as a whole? Yes. Is it doable? That depends on leadership and know how.
But can it be done. Absolutely! How do I know? That's what I do for a living.
Cal
caldifalco@cogeco.ca
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 11/6/2007 3:30:39 PM
Hi Cal,
"I am a Transformation Director by trade."
Can you please arrange to be hired by the city? The departments of public works and economic development are in desperate need for a gestalt shift in their conception of how a city is supposed to function.
By Capitalist
Posted 11/6/2007 3:54:20 PM
I think that all this pedestrial mall talk is just nonsense. If you want to improve downtown convert Main and King to two-way traffic. Both streets are expressways that make the downtown look dead. Streets with two-way traffic look more alive and vibrant - that is what people want to see downtown. Second, get rid of all the bums, Hamilton is not and should not be a dumping ground for every homeless shelter and low-income housing project. We have more than enough already.
By Cal DiFalco
Posted 11/6/2007 4:15:04 PM
Thank-you Ryan.
Maybe we should do coffee sometime. Be pleased to bounce some ideas back and forth.
Cal
By S
Posted 11/6/2007 7:06:51 PM
I don’t know if a pedestrian mall would be an automatic slamdunk. There are some places where it works and others that don’t.
Sparks Street in Ottawa while busy during work hours is quite desolate on weekends and evenings. The businesses there are hardly the kind that attract people. It has very little life and I know many tourists are often surprised by how empty it is.
On the other hand, I quite like Granville Island in Vancouver. Not a true “pedestrian mall” but pleasant nevertheless. It seems very busy every day of the week.
I do applaud the mayor for trying to think outside the box.
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 11/7/2007 7:58:44 AM
Cal, my email is editor@raisethehammer.org . Drop me a line if you're downtown and want to meet for a coffee.
You know you are at the bottom of the ninth when you have to schlep a tonne of sand to get a barrel of oil." -- Jeffrey Rubin, CIBC Chief Economist
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Defining "Squelchers" (May. 15, 2008) -
From Richard Florida's Who's Your City? (Random House Canada 2008), p. 181:
Jane Jacobs once told me that communities everywhere are filled with creative vigor, but that some of the
On Beggars and Choosers (May. 14, 2008) - I'm reading Richard Florida's new book Who's Your City?, and it's an absolute banquet of insights into how cities work and how to make them work better, backed by robust statistica
Red Hill Promise Fulfilled? (May. 14, 2008) - Red Hill Valley Parkway supporters are crowing about a new box store opening on Barton near Woodward as if this were a validation of their support and a repudiation of its opponents. A brilliantly
Album Review: Bang! by Drowning Girl (May. 10, 2008) -
When "Bang!" (Puck Eye Records, 2007), the debut album by Toronto's Drowning Girl, landed on my desk, I had no idea what to expect. I had heard only that they played "indie pop", s
Light Rail: Biggest Challenges Lie Ahead (May. 9, 2008) - With the announcement by the city's rapid transit office that the public comments they've received have strongly supported light rail, we may be tempted to rest on our laurels and assume t
City: Strong Public Support for Light Rail (May. 9, 2008) -
The city's department of public works just issued a press release summarizing the two public information centres it held this week on the Rapid Transit Feasibility Study (RTFS).
According
PRINT EDITION
By Genghis
Posted 10/23/2007 10:21:09 AM
I have mixed feelings on this.I would love to see more public open spaces like Sparks street, but the "people" also define a city.That picture of Sparks street must have been taken at lunchtime.
Driving down King at the city centre near the epitaphs what I see is a collection of farily imnnocent looking loiterers drinking tim hortons with not much to do, to groups of twentysomething unemployed types exchanging money for something in broad daylight.
Being new here I am trying to keep optimistist in the "If you build it they will come" mentality.. but WHO will come?In a high income area/ city like Ottawa sparks street it will attract money and commerce and families for a nice day out to while away some time.In areas that have "challenges" after dark it could become a clearing house for drug dealers down and outers Homeless and more nefarious types.( Note:I have nothing against the homeless and in fact,it is good that they are in our faces to let us all know they are there and exist and are human beings.)We have to be careful how/ where they are designed and what the outcomes will be.
Recently I was at the Toronto Armoury area which is a public space.OMG.Accosted twice for money,yelled at for not giving money,aksed to beat up someone who stole the persons money.all this within the hour
Perhaps the two issues such as more Public spaces and social issues should be handled separatly, but sometimes we create one good thing and create another bad thing.If the public space was public but had some sort of security I would mot mind as much.
A Good example of the reverse is Zurichs "needle" park.Once a well known public park that turned into a shooting gallery in the 90s has been taken back by Families to be a real open space park
(Permalink)