Comment 1746

By Ryan (registered) - website | Posted October 25, 2006 at 13:55:59

During the 2003 election, Marvin Caplan was pro-UN World Biosphere Preserve and pro-expressway (I called him on it, and our correspondence led eventually to his Sep. 15, 2005 opinion piece in RTH). He went down in flames in the polls.

Granted, voters in ward 1 saw little benefit in an expensive expressway on the other side of the city, so the comparison may not be fair.

The short answer is that Eisenberger can be both anti-sprawl and pro-expressway because his campaign is the product of market research, not political philosophy. See the blog I just posted on this matter:

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools