City to Install Permanent Bumpouts at Herkimer and Locke

City staff do an about-face and embrace tactical urbanism as a way to make short-term, low-cost changes that help pave the way for a larger culture shift.

By Graham McNally
Published May 23, 2013

Special Report: Tactical Urbanism

On Tuesday, Phil Toms and I met with Councillor Brian McHattie and John Mater, Director of Corporate Assets and Strategic Planning from the City of Hamilton, to review the recent pylon installation that occurred at Herkimer and Locke.

Image of plan as proposed by the City
Image of plan as proposed by the City

For those unfamiliar with the installation, at the end of April, the Hamilton-Burlington Society of Architects invited Mike Lydon of the Street Plans Collaborative in Brooklyn, New York, to come to Hamilton to introduce Tactical Urbanism and lead a day of thinking, imagining and designing.

Pylon Bumpouts at Herkimer and Locke

In the weeks between the Charrette and the subsequent public talk on the subject of Tactical Urbanism, pylons were placed at the intersection of Locke and Herkimer, cited by many pedestrians as a threatening intersection.

The pylons provided 'bumpouts' (additional space for pedestrians) which have the effect of shortening the crossing distance, placing pedestrians in a more visible location at the corner and reducing the turning radius available to cars which reduces the speed at which the corner can be navigated.

Bumpout at southwest corner of Herkimer and Locke
Bumpout at southwest corner of Herkimer and Locke

Through the course of our meeting, we learned that the City will be making the short term action a permanent installation complete with bump-outs on Herkimer on both sides of Locke and 'ladder' style crosswalks.

The project will be a kind of pilot project for the Traffic Calming Master Plan that City staff are currently working on and intend to take to council in the next few months.

Could this be the start of something?

Encouraging Installation

This installation is an about-face on the City's part from the position taken in the memo circulated to senior staff, and it is encouraging for a number of reasons.

First, there have been tireless efforts by many residents of this City to try to get our streets made more pedestrian-friendly. Hours of volunteer work have gone into their research, writing and activism. For years, I would argue, their efforts have been acknowledged but little has been done.

During our discussion at Herkimer and Locke, we raised the idea of building on this first pilot project by selecting intersections throughout the City to become test cases for the City's new policy on Traffic Calming. We talked about new installations occurring bi-weekly as a "rendering in real time" of the City's new strategy.

The idea of very small pilot projects is new to the City in this context, but the benefits with regard to building momentum and educating citizens to what the City's plans are is attractive to the City and I think they will move in this direction.

Next - and perhaps we shouldn't have surprised to find this - we found that John Mater, whose responsibilities include traffic and road design, 'gets it'.

That is, he took no issue with the proposition and actually wanted to extend the project down Locke and do work at additional intersections, in particular, Locke and Hunter.

Engaging Citizens

We had a great discussion about how the ideas of Tactical Urbanism (short-term, low-cost) can be used to engage residents and demonstrate that the City is working to improve the pedestrian realm and create complete streets even while policy and planning documents are being worked on for months and years.

Finally, we talked about the 'culture shift' in City Hall that City Manager Chris Murray talked about recently in The Spectator. Based on our conversation Tuesday and the way that the City is now embracing Tactical Urbanism and looking to it to find ways of engaging citizens, it definitely appears that we may start to see a different approach to our streets.

How all this plays out in the end, I'm not sure. But considering that the HBSA invited Mike Lydon up in early May and not even a month later we're talking about the City installing bumpouts in response to concerned citizens is encouraging.

Maybe even more encouraging is they intend to develop policy and programs to propagate similar installations across the City. I'm excited to see what happens in the next few months.

Graham is an architect practicing in Hamilton with an interest in urban design and issues.

9 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By Conrad664 (anonymous)
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:21:07

Hi Ryan

The city should do the same thing for the Ivor Wynn Pan Am nayborhood as they are planning it now ,

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 2 (2 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

By Conrad664 (anonymous)
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:22:47 in reply to Comment 88888

they should do it near the Pan Am site on King Cannon and Barton area

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 2 (2 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
[ - ]

By BeulahAve (registered)
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:21:55

Best news I have had all day! Congrats to Crossing Guard Wendy (pictured in photo above, to left of renowned Canadian artiste Gord Leverton watching for cars) whose first-hand street knowledge gave credence to the ideas coming from outside our city.

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 3 (3 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

By Ryan (registered) - website
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:36:49 in reply to Comment 88889

On the Friday before the bumpouts were removed, I asked the crossing guard what she thought of the project. With immediate enthusiasm, she said, "I like it!" She didn't know who had installed the cones or why, but she was highly supportive, saying it makes the corner a lot safer.

The traffic calming "really controls the traffic. It was getting scary," she said, noting that the bumpouts force the cars to slow down instead of racing aggressively through the intersection.

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 1 (1 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
[ - ]

By jason (registered)
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:25:40

Wow...I'm equally pumped about the bumpouts AND the bold-lined crosswalk treatment. I want this treatment all across the city. Hunter and Locke absolutely needs this treatment. Ditto for Main and Locke.

And pretty much every intersection on Cannon.

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 2 (2 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
[ - ]

By Gored (anonymous)
Posted May 23, 2013 at 13:50:33

This is good news. Great job getting the city on board. But I wonder what they're going to do on the Cannon St. site of another tactical urbanism act. Sad if only affluent neighbourhoods get cooperation from the city.

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 2 (2 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
[ - ]

By Pxtl (registered) - website
Posted May 23, 2013 at 14:32:30

Awesome. I'm honestly surprised the city managed to swallow their pride and do the right thing.

So, King at Dundurn next? Please? Pretty please?

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: 1 (1 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

By hshields (registered) - website
Posted May 23, 2013 at 14:40:31 in reply to Comment 88895

King and Dundurn must be one of the busiest intersections in the west end. You have motorists pressuring to turn left from Dundurn onto King in order to gain access to the 403; you have motorists wanting to turn right from Dundurn onto King in the opposite direction for the same reason. Then you have timed lights and a wave of traffic barrelling down King also trying to access the 403 or go into Westdale. On top of all of this, you have a major shopping plaza, a HSR and GO bus stop (B-line stop too).

All of this explains why this was one of the first intersections to get red light cameras. It also explains why Dundurn Plaza has been given some attention and densification plans are under way. The next logical step to help faciliate densification plans is to start installing subtle but effective traffic behaviour modification tools.

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: None (0 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
[ - ]

By theninjasquad (registered) - website
Posted May 23, 2013 at 14:35:00

Why is everything new that's done in this city considered a pilot project?

Reply | Permalink | Context

Comment Score: None (0 votes)
You must be logged in to vote on this comment.
View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

Comment Anonymously
Screen Name
What do you get if you multiply 5 and 1?
Leave This Field Blank
Comment

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Site Tools

Feeds