Do Minister Chan and City Council members really want to be remembered as the elected officials who stood by and allowed an irreplaceable part of Ontario's built heritage to be destroyed?
By Ryan McGreal
Published August 09, 2013
We are meant to take some comfort from the knowledge that Hamilton City Council voted to add the buildings around Gore Park - excluding 18-28 King Street East - to the City's register of properties of cultural heritage value or interest, defined in Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
18-28 King Street East, at imminent risk of demolition (RTH file photo)
Under the terms of the Act, that means if the owner of a building on the register submits a demolition permit request to the City, they have to give the City 60 days' notice.
In the case of a functional City Council that recognized the value of built heritage, this would give the Council an opportunity to intervene and prevent the demolition, either through an agreement with the property owner or by designating the building under Section 29 of the Act.
A building designated under the Act has some real protection from being demolished. (The owner can submit an objection to the designation, but that objection goes to a Review Board, which makes a recommendation in an open hearing.)
Unfortunately, Hamilton does not have such a Council. Indeed, what frustrates me the most about this whole affair is the sinking realization that our City Council as a whole really does not care about heritage, especially in the lower city.
I appreciate that Councillor McHattie and Farr have presented what they believe is the best outcome they can expect Council to support, i.e. demolition and a promise that the property owner will bolt some "heritage features" onto the new construction if and when they rebuild, even though they don't have a development plan and are only demolishing now to take advantage of low interest rates.
But if Council won't use the power it possesses right now to prevent the demolition of 18-28 King Street East, what is the point of adding the rest of the buildings to a Register that merely adds a 60 day waiting period to a demolition permit?
It has already been nearly eight months since the demolition permit was submitted for 18-28 King Street East: plenty of time for Council to act if it wanted to do so.
Indeed, Council rejected even the bare-bones motion from the Heritage Committee last November to add 18-28 King Street East to the register, when it looked like the buildings might be at risk of demolition.
As for the Province, I am dismayed that Tourism and Culture Minister Michael Chan refuses to intervene to protect Ontario's heritage from the negligent stewardship of Hamilton's Council. It is simply not acceptable for the Province to fail to take action merely because the municipality has also failed to take action.
Why did the Ontario Government bother to write, debate and enact so thoughtful and sensible a piece of legislation as the Heritage Act if it then refuses to exercise its principal mandate of protecting heritage?
Do Minister Chan and Hamilton's City Council members really want to be remembered as the elected officials who stood by and allowed an irreplaceable part of Ontario's built heritage to be destroyed?
Why go into politics at all, if not to leave a political legacy of which one can be proud? Will anyone on Council or at Queen's Park be proud to declare they let these buildings fall?
Tell Council and the Province to designate the Gore and protect these buildings from demolition:
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bob.Bratina@hamilton.ca, Brian.McHattie@hamilton.ca, Jason.Farr@hamilton.ca, Bernie.Morelli@hamilton.ca, Sam.Merulla@hamilton.ca, Chad.Collins@hamilton.ca, Tom.Jackson@hamilton.ca, Scott.Duvall@hamilton.ca, Terry.Whitehead@hamilton.ca, Brad.Clark@hamilton.ca, Maria.Pearson@hamilton.ca, Brenda.Johnson@hamilton.ca, Lloyd.Ferguson@hamilton.ca, Russ.Powers@hamilton.ca, Robert.Pasuta@hamilton.ca, Judi.Partridge@hamilton.ca, email@example.com, Peter.firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, tmcMeekin.firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
You must be logged in to comment.