Raise the Hammer
Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) urges voters and candidates to take steps now to make the November 13 city council election more democratic, fair and transparent.
By RTH Staff
Aug. 30, 2006
Last week, Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) launched a campaign to make the November 13 city council election more democratic fair, and transparent. We at Raise the Hammer support this initiative completely. Today, money confers far too much influence over the results of municipal elections, skewing the elected representatives in favour of developer interests and distorting the local political process.
The Ontario Municipal Elections Act is a good start toward making local elections more fair and democratic, but while it allows for citizens to challenge campaign finance abuses after the fact, it does not go far enough in forcing candidates to be open and transparent about their donors before voting day.
When an elected mayor can break the law and accept over $30,000 in illegal donations, only to get off with a light fine and a reprimand, we at RTH believe democracy cannot flourish fully. The CATCH campaign is a fair way to bridge the gaps in our election law and make candidates more accountable to voters.
With permission from CATCH, we reproduce the entire CATCH pledge below.
Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) urges voters and candidates to take steps now to make the November 13 city council election more democratic, fair and transparent.
Despite promises to do so, the provincial government has failed to amend the deeply flawed legislation on donations to municipal candidates. That leaves the task to the candidates and the voters to make this election fairer.
CATCH calls on ALL city council candidates:
- To make public a list of your donors and donations over $100 before the November 13 elections;
- To accept campaign donations only from individuals, not from corporations or unions.
- If you do accept corporate or union contributions, to make a public promise before the election to not participate in decisions that come before council that financially benefit your corporate or union donors.
CATCH calls on all citizens in Hamilton:
- To make donations to council candidates and to actively participate in the election campaign in support of the candidates of your choice;
- To vote and to actively encourage others to vote in the November 13 election;
- To ask all candidates to support the campaign for Fair Election Financing Now.
CATCH calls on all organizations, voters and candidates:
- To endorse and publicize the above calls;
- To urge provincial politicians to reform the laws on municipal election financing.
Governments are elected to represent citizens and the public interest. CATCH believes that corporate and union donations distort this process and deny the principle that each voter has an equal opportunity to support the candidates of his or her choice.
When corporate or union donations are permitted, some individuals can unfairly make multiple donations - as individuals and also as business owners or union members. Many of the corporate donations are written off as business expenses and force taxpayers to cover part of the donation.
In addition, many corporations and unions ask city government to make decisions that benefit them financially. Politicians who receive donations from corporations or unions should not participate in government decisions that affect their corporate or union donors.
Many others have called for real reforms to election finances, including Toronto city council, the Federation of Urban Neighbourhoods, the Hamilton and District Labour Council, and the Toronto Star. We think improvements are possible now, without waiting for the province to do its job, and we are willing to help.
To help candidates, CATCH is prepared to assist candidates to make their donations and donors public before the election. We are offering to post their lists our website or to provide a link to another location of these lists. We ask candidates to provide these three times before election day - September 15, October 15 and November 10.
Provincial law currently requires candidates to reveal publicly a list of all donors who give them more than $100. Unfortunately, this is not required until four months AFTER the election. In the United States, candidates must reveal who their donors are BEFORE the election, so that this information is available to the voters when they cast their vote.
CATCH thinks that citizens should help finance the election campaigns of the candidates of their choice. If you are concerned about corporate and union influence over politicians, an excellent response is to financially support good candidates, and to volunteer to work on their campaigns.
We urge you to vote on election day, and to popularize the CATCH campaign for Fair Election Financing Now.
If you want to go to Mexico, and you're driving toward Canada, even if you slow down you're still going to Canada." -- William McDonough, architect, on how being less bad is not the same as being good
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Aerotropolis: Will It Fly? - Wednesday, December 3, 2008, at Mount Hope Community Hall, 3027 Homestead Dr., Mount Hope.
McMaster ruffles some feathers with child ward renaming (Dec. 3, 2008) - An article in the Globe and Mail, Health care in a bucket with fries, came to the attention of a RTH reader recently, who sent it along for us to check out (thanks, by the way!)
The article is ab
Can Harper Prorogue Parliament? (Dec. 3, 2008) - Given the paucity of Prime Minister Stephen Harpers options as Monday's confidence vote draws closer, pundits and analysts are coalescing around the conclusion that he will ask Governor Genera
Picking a Prime Minister: A Parliamentary Primer (Dec. 2, 2008) -
We will use all legal means to resist this undemocratic seizure of power.
-- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
With the Liberals and NDP agreeing to a coalition with the support of the B
Bratina: City Hall Plan Could Save $110 Million Over 20 Years (Dec. 2, 2008) - Councillor Bob Bratina, who has proposed that the City remain at Hamilton City Centre, is claiming that this move will cost only $50 million over the next 20 years, compared to $150 million to com
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) - Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Same Old 'Traffic Trumps Everything' Thinking (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Apparently, the City Traffic department still doesn't get it.
After turning James and John into two-way streets that slowed traffic down, the city is now looking for ways to speed thing