The only way to bring trust back to politics is not to vote for candidates who have broken our trust.
By Trey Shaughnessy
Nov. 8, 2006
Throughout our lives we have different relationships - with a spouse, co-workers, doctor, teacher, coach, friends, police, and elected officials. With each of these relationships we have or expect a certain degree of trust. In some relationships we have complete trust, which is why it is most distressing when that trust is broken.
We trust that our children's teacher will not cause them harm. We trust that our spouse will be truthful. We trust that other drivers will show caution and regard for our safety. We trust that police officers will do their jobs and conduct themselves appropriately.
Generally, the higher the level of expected trust, the greater the disappointment when that trust is violated. The problem we have with politicians in general is that we have such a low expectation to begin with. When politicians say one thing and do another, or have hidden agendas that are exposed, we aren't surprised.
They actually get away with deceit because it has become expected. As voters, we make the problem worse by rewarding untrustworthy politicians with votes to put them back in office.
The only way to bring trust back to politics is not to vote for candidates who have broken our trust. There are two very important boxes in our society: the ballot box and the jury box. We can either use the ballot box as a powerful tool or squander it.
An election is our chance to reward or punish elected officials not just based on promises and/or successes and failures that may or may not be entirely their responsibility, but also to reward politicians who have integrity. When I think of some great politicians in our history, they are great for being honest, not for making the best decisions.
We all try to make the best decisions, based on our knowledge and circumstances. Some are good choices and others are not. The difference is that if a choice is made with honesty to their platform, themselves and to the electorate, it is more important then the actual decision.
It's more important primarily because they are in the position to make such a decision that affects so many people, because they were entrusted with the power in the first place.
This election, vote for the candidate who has earned your trust. Since many candidates are saying the same thing, or saying what they think we want to hear, it is difficult to choose based on policy. More often than not, the policy changes once they are elected anyway. A vote for trust will put honesty and ethics back into politics.
I'd appoint Joanna Chapman integrity commissioner, Dave Braden financial watchdog, Bob Morrow city ambassador, and Larry Di Ianni provincial fundraiser." -- Don McLean, on what he would do if he were mayor
ISSN: 1715-1554
James North Holiday Displays - Saturday, December 6, 2008, at James North Arts District, .
Streetwall Fail (Nov. 21, 2008) - We worried back in 2005 that the Centre Mall redevelopment would leave Barton and Ottawa with a big box conglomeration that would turn its back on its surroundings and destroy any chance of pedest
Comment on Hamilton Cycling Master Plan (Nov. 19, 2008) - Nearly a decade after publishing Shifting Gears (PDF), the city's original Cycling Master Plan, Hamilton has undertaken to update the plan and make some real strides in moving the cycling agen
Defacing Our City Hall: A Rally to Protect Hamilton's City Hall (Nov. 18, 2008) -
Date: Saturday, November 22, 2008
Time: 11:00 AM
Location: 71 Main St. W. (directly in front of Hamilton City Hall), Hamilton ON
Hamilton City Hall (RTH file photo)
Hamilton
National Post Discovers Hamilton (Nov. 17, 2008) -
Scott Weir, an associate with ERA Architects and occasional freelance columnist for the National Post, let the cat out of the bag this past Saturday in a laudatory piece on Hamilton.
Titled "T
Kiva: A Great Idea Whose Time Has Come (Nov. 14, 2008) -
Here's a great idea whose time has come. A little website called Kiva is making a difference in the toughest parts of the world.
"The global credit crisis may be rocking the mainstream ec
HSR Needs Funding, Not Belt-Tightening (Nov. 13, 2008) -
The Hamilton Spectator's opposition to another bus fare hike is most welcome and well-founded. But their "solution" of asking the HSR to further tighten its belt is not practical.
The HSR