By RTH Staff
Published May 09, 2008
The city's department of public works just issued a press release summarizing the two public information centres it held this week on the Rapid Transit Feasibility Study (RTFS).
According to Jillian Stephen, the public works manager in charge of the rapid transit initiative, "We learned that there is strong support for transit improvements in Hamilton and light rail in particular."
The initial results from the comment forms are:
Stephen noted, "There is a sense of urgency to ensure that Hamilton is included in the first cut at the Metrolinx five-year capital budget being released this fall."
As citizens, we need to do everything we can to ensure that the city has a very strong mandate to push ahead with light rail so that council can support it and seek funding from the province.
If you haven't yet, please communicate your support for light rail. The city is still accepting comments for inclusing in its next report to the public works committee until May 20. To add your comment, visit the city's rapid transit website and download a comment form, send an email to rapidtransit@hamilton.ca, or call the office at (905) 546-2424 x1473.
By g. (anonymous)
Posted May 09, 2008 18:32:41
( Permalink )
By jason (registered)
Posted May 09, 2008 19:12:48
we ripped up the tracks because HSR officials got in the sack with bus technology companies (would you really expect that they made that decision based on public interest??). Transit has stunk ever since they removed the tracks and overhead for trolley buses. LRT will finally allow Hamilton to function like a real city again. I'm excited that most residents are recognizing that.
( Permalink )
By nobrainer (registered)
Posted May 09, 2008 19:35:57
"A mountain resident who has been around for a while was quoted in the paper. And she nailed it. Hamilton, she said, we've been there and done that and ripped up the tracks....find another way."
Hey everybody! I think I found a "squelcher"!
( Permalink )
By rayell (anonymous)
Posted May 09, 2008 19:50:12
( Permalink )
By For Light Rail (anonymous)
Posted May 09, 2008 20:58:49
( Permalink )
By Al Rathbone (anonymous)
Posted May 10, 2008 01:14:21
( Permalink )
By WRCU2 (registered) - website
Posted May 10, 2008 09:58:29
The percentages do not reflect that of a majority consensus. I was in the crowd and I saw very few regular folks there. The numbers are drawn out for our ROI chagrin and for the pleasure of people like Harry "Condo King" Stinson.
If we want this city to win We must employ here within Less consultant's boarded spin And more grounded noses worn thin
I'm not a SQUELCHER I'm a bad math mouthed BELCHER
I have not been shown how LRT is gonna put more cash into my pocket or for that matter, prevent it from leaving my pocket that much quicker. This is a 1.2 billion dollar pipe dream and if you want to see what "up in smoke" looks like, see my home page pics of a belching Chaiten and the sink hole we're headed in.
( Permalink )
By g. (anonymous)
Posted May 10, 2008 13:34:25
( Permalink )
By highwater (registered)
Posted May 10, 2008 15:44:31
Et tu, WRCU2? Like our old friend Baystreeter, you have set up a neat little Catch 22, where the opinions of people who show up to meetings don't count by virtue of the fact that they're the sort of people who bother to show up to meetings. We pay lip service to democratic ideals, but the minute citizens become engaged, we marginalize them by declaring them to be a special interest group. I wasn't at the Light Rail meeting (Does that make me "regular"? Am I allowed to have an opinion, or do you need to see my clothing and choice of caffeinated beverages first?), but I've been to plenty of other community meetings and I'm getting pretty sick of being told that I'm some kind of hippy who doesn't count just because I give a crap. Not only is this tiresome, but it's deeply dangerous to democracy, as it serves to discourage citizens from getting involved. Maybe that's the idea.
( Permalink )
By Rob (anonymous)
Posted May 11, 2008 01:12:32
( Permalink )
By WRCU2 (registered) - website
Posted May 11, 2008 10:02:13
Golly g, your wont to chide does not bode well with me without first meeting together over crumb pits and t. Perhaps someday I'll meet with thee flamboyant friend of an LLC.
I speak (or write or pose weak prose) for all those whose nose is in transit as it comes and it goes. Harry took the bus home, he's putting his money where his mouth is and that is good for him. He has a plan and a vision. I'm not putting him down because he moves in different circles than I do. I write about the big numbers few of us regular folk can even begin to comprehend as we stretch out our pay checks to meet the week's end. I write from the quagmire of real life experiences of the common man. Because that is where I'm from and that is what I am. We, as in regular folk, generally do not have an informed, intelligible and coherent voice in the high tower's audience of choice. I only hope to empower those among us, to stand up and rejoice.
Thank you highwater for making a fair juxtaposition in lieu of g, the anonymously nameless, ramped of the most shameless, in-tent-city.
( Permalink )
By g. (anonymous)
Posted May 11, 2008 13:20:51
( Permalink )
WRCU2,
Every time you post a comment saying you haven't seen evidence that LRT is going to be good for the bottom line, a bunch of people post replies explaining just that.
Then you move to the next article and post the same comment over again.
Are you ever going to acknowledge the responses you've already received?
Based on the evidence from other cities, a $300 million investment in light rail could generate $1.8 billion in new private investment in the transit-oriented-development" corridor near the line.
That would work out to tens of millions of dollars in new tax assessments - money the city doesn't have to collect from you in property tax increases.
For 2008, the city projects a net tax assessment increase of 0 percent. Our current economic development strategies - roads, highways, and "employment lands" on the edge of town - aren't working.
Light Rail works. It's proven in city after city after city across North America and Europe.
The question for you is: are you going to acknowledge all the evidence posted here, on hamiltonlightrail.com, and elsewhere, or are you going to keep popping up the same old questions in comment after comment, like badly applied wallpaper?
Your call.
( Permalink )
By seancb (registered) - website
Posted May 15, 2008 10:27:16
When LRT is built, perhaps we can arrange that WRCU2 can refrain from paying the transit levy.
Keep in mind, W... this will require you to wear an ankle cuff that disallows you entry to the train, the stations, and any new developments along the line.
But don't worry W, you can continue to pay at the pump and visit all of your favourite destinations by car. And before too long our $4.50 round trip fare will represent the cost of a single litre of your gasoline.
Bon voyage!
( Permalink )
By Mountaineer (anonymous)
Posted May 09, 2008 17:17:12
( Permalink )