By: Jason Leach
Published: 2008/10/06 (Category: Architecture)
Dear Mayor and Members of Council,
I've been following the ongoing discussions regarding the renovations of Hamilton City Hall.
As a resident and taxpayer in Hamilton, I certainly appreciate the desire to manage costs and keep taxes low.
However, I believe that there are certain instances where saving a few million dollars can end up doing more harm than good. The current reno plans for city hall must be viewed in a broader context. This isn't just another building being reno'd in a corner of the city where folks won't notice it.
This is our seat of government. City Hall represents our city to newcomers, visitors, residents and investors alike.
A few points that I would like to share with you:
I encourage council to look at this project as a legacy project. I appreciate the desire to shave off a few million from the cost, but as a taxpayer, I happily support spending the extra millions in order to get a city hall that we can all be proud of and hold up as a standard for other developers to follow in our city.
We don't need a Taj Mahal, but we certainly deserve better than concrete and aluminum. The steel, marble and tile mosaics are what make this building so stunning.
Let's make the right decision with the image and future of our city in mind.
I totally disagree, this building has always been an eyesore to me and most people I know. I would have gladly paid more on my tax bill to see this building torn down and a new modern/classic built in it's place (along with the surrounding features you mentioned). This whole reno has been problematic and a joke to other communities looking in.
My humble opinion only, no offence meant.
This building is widely acknowledged to be one of the finest remaining examples of the International Style in the country. Now you may not like the International Style. Fair enough. You are entitled to your opinion. Personally, Victorian architecture does nothing for me, but you won't see me going around saying every poorly maintained Victorian building is an 'eyesore' that should be torn down, because I recognize that they are a vital part of our history and our urban fabric. You don't have to like City Hall, but you do need to recognize it for the special building that it is, and not rob future generations who will value this style of architecture.
Economic Development and Planning voted for aluminum and concrete yesterday.
Full council vote is tomorrow.
Ironically, they also voted in favour of a new bylaw yesterday requiring owners of designated heritage buildings (which city hall is) to properly maintain their buildings.
Do as I say not as I do??
Next council meeting is Wed. Oct. 15. The agenda should be available tomorrow.
The Mayor is doing a poll on the City Hall issue at his website - www.mayorfred.ca
Stainless Steel, anyone? :D
ISSN: 1715-1554
Aerotropolis: Will It Fly? - Wednesday, December 3, 2008, at Mount Hope Community Hall, 3027 Homestead Dr., Mount Hope.
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) - Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Same Old 'Traffic Trumps Everything' Thinking (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Apparently, the City Traffic department still doesn't get it.
After turning James and John into two-way streets that slowed traffic down, the city is now looking for ways to speed thing
Toronto Council to Vote on Corporate, Union Donations (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Toronto City Council has another opportunity today to decide whether to allow corporate and union donations to be proffered during municipal campaigns.
City Council has voted against such don
Poor and Dirty (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Your humble editor presents a modest tribute to the Hamilton Spectator report, "Poor and dirty", published November 27, 2008.
Poor and Dirty
They see us rollin'
On the highway
The
Double Downtown Density? We Should be Aiming to Quadruple It (Nov. 28, 2008) - Today's Spectator carries a head-scratching article on a proposal by Councillor Brian McHattie to double the downtown's urban density of 200 people and jobs per hectare to 400 people and j
Councillors Propose Salary Freeze (Nov. 28, 2008) - Councillors Chad Collins, Scott Duvall, Sam Merulla, Bernie Morelli and Terry Whitehead just issued a press release proposing a salary freeze for Councillors and non-union employees across the mun
By highwater
Posted 10/7/2008 8:57:59 AM
Thanks for this Jason, and thanks for the reminder. I meant to send a letter myself. The vote's today so better get off my duff.
(Permalink)