Raise the Hammer
By: Ryan McGreal
Published: 2007/11/22 (Category: Transportation)
If you didn't catch it on Tuesday, the Hamilton Spectator carried an excellent op-ed by Don McLean in which he argues that the city should "start using public transit to improve our local economy, reduce air pollution, fight global climate change and help Hamiltonians cope with rapidly rising fuel prices."
Detailing nearly two decades of funding cuts, fare hikes and all around lack of love for the beleagured HSR, McLean makes a strong case for transit as a public good that can catalyze downtown economic revitalization, improve prospects for low income residents and improve our environment.
He notes that Council is reluctant to allocate more tax revenue for transit, prefering to raise fares and use the gas tax transfers to offset operating costs instead of improving service.
Between competing priorities and the political minefield of area rating, in which different parts of the city pay different rates toward transit, City Council has long been stuck in a mindset where transit is a "budgetary pressure" to be minimized rather than an investment in making the city more vibrant and livable.
Some of the folks at city hall may care but they don't matter because the people who hold control are from the previous generation where private vehicles and paving are paramount. (lots of p-words :) ) It's nearly impossible as a young person to get a job in transit or transportation management (believe me, I've tried) simply because they're always looking for people to fill vacant positions. What should be done is to allow new individuals with a forward thinking perspective to work alongside those who think that solving transportation problems means building more roads. That way new ideas are aired instead of old ones.
Great article from Don. Once again I am left to wonder why the citizens of Hamilton are the ones having to cover these issues. How much work did Don have to put in the put this report together? And how much did he get paid for it?!
The Spec needs to be held to account for it's lack of municipal issues reporting.
Well, at least they printed it. Faint praise, I know.
the Spec's too busy chiding us for voting down the gold smeltering plant...
and the abattoir that laid a golden egg.
Jason...had to laugh at your comment...seems all the ideas the folks at the Spec can think about for their "Future City" is roads. Did you see they've paved a causeway now from Burlington to Grimsby. And the "chunnel" to Toronto.
I was hoping that would be an interesting exercise in mapping out what kind of future city Hamiltonians want to live in, it's become a complete joke. Now they want us to vote on whether the city gets hit by an earthquake and a flu pandemic. If the city evolves like it does in their "simulation", I vote both.
I'd like to see the Spec play SimCity and build Hamilton exactly as they propose.
I bet every natural disaster that game can muster up would be rolling across the harbour within a month.
If you want a real laugh, go onto the future city website and check out their little "i" popup symbols at the site of past votes.
Sounds like Maple Leaf all over again - "the city loses investment to another municipality by voting down a gold smeltering plant". "Port businesses take a financial hit when citizens vote against building a new canal through the east end". It's hilarious. I wonder which disaster we're 'supposed' to vote for. Probably the earthquake, that way local builders can make a fortune rebuilding the city afterwards.
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Aerotropolis: Will It Fly? - Wednesday, December 3, 2008, at Mount Hope Community Hall, 3027 Homestead Dr., Mount Hope.
Can Harper Prorogue Parliament? (Dec. 3, 2008) - Given the paucity of Prime Minister Stephen Harpers options as Monday's confidence vote draws closer, pundits and analysts are coalescing around the conclusion that he will ask Governor Genera
Picking a Prime Minister: A Parliamentary Primer (Dec. 2, 2008) -
We will use all legal means to resist this undemocratic seizure of power.
-- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
With the Liberals and NDP agreeing to a coalition with the support of the B
Bratina: City Hall Plan Could Save $110 Million Over 20 Years (Dec. 2, 2008) - Councillor Bob Bratina, who has proposed that the City remain at Hamilton City Centre, is claiming that this move will cost only $50 million over the next 20 years, compared to $150 million to com
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) - Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Same Old 'Traffic Trumps Everything' Thinking (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Apparently, the City Traffic department still doesn't get it.
After turning James and John into two-way streets that slowed traffic down, the city is now looking for ways to speed thing
Toronto Council to Vote on Corporate, Union Donations (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Toronto City Council has another opportunity today to decide whether to allow corporate and union donations to be proffered during municipal campaigns.
City Council has voted against such don
By jason
Posted 11/22/2007 1:24:55 PM
he's right, and isn't telling us anything we don't already know.
The real problem is the fact that this might be a lost cause in Hamilton.
City hall simply doesn't care.
(Permalink)