Healing Gaia

This Monday, Vote for Positive Change

Canada has become a very different country under Stephen Harper. It's no longer the country we knew and loved. But together we can change this.

By Doreen Nicoll
Published October 16, 2015

This article has been updated.

Record numbers of Canadians voted in the advance polls this past week. Let's hope an unprecedented number vote for change on Monday, October 19.

If you still have to vote, please consider which candidate, and party, supports the kind of Canada that you, your family, friends, neighbours and co-workers want to live in.

This was a long election, but Stephen Harper spent too much time distracting the public from the real issues. He avoided important topics. He ignored invitations to speak with women's groups and told his candidates to follow his lead.

Here's some basic information about issues that impact all Canadians and which should have received more attention.

Child Care

Children need a strong start early in life. Mothers and fathers need peace of mind when they return to work. Both of these goals can be met with accessible, affordable universal child care.

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) charted [PDF] what women aged 25-34 spend on childcare as a percentage of income. In Brampton, it's an average of 36 percent. In Surrey, Windsor, Toronto and London, it's 34-35 percent. In Hamilton, it's 31 percent. In Quebec, child care is a lot more affordable due to the provincial child care program. In the rest of the country, the lack of affordable regulated spaces means many women must choose between remaining out of the workforce, using unregulated home care or relatives.

Chart: Average child care costs for women as a percentage of income (Image Credit: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)
Chart: Average child care costs for women as a percentage of income (Image Credit: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)

Staying out of the workforce perpetuates economic inequality for women and is simply not an option for female headed households or families trying to balance housing costs, student debt, and the uncertainty of precarious employment.

Harper cancelled Paul Martin's national child care policy and replaced it with a taxable monthly payment. Currently, parents receive $160 for each child under six and $60 for each child six to 17.

Vote for a national child care policy that creates well-paying early childhood educator jobs along with safe, affordable spaces for our children.

Health Care

Harper is set to cut federal transfer payments to the provinces and is hell bent on privatizing our universal health care system. There's a distinct lack of vision and forethought to this plan.

Canadians need a leader who will sit down with the provinces and not only reinstate realistic transfer payments to the provinces, but include pharmaceutical coverage in the new deal.

The Canada Health Act provides coverage for physician services, hospital care, and pharmaceuticals used in hospital. However, once a patient is discharged they're responsible for the cost of all medications.

Pharmacare is an important election issue as illnesses and conditions that used to be treated in hospital are now increasingly being taken care of at home. This evolution in the health care system only works if patients can afford prescribed medications.

In fact, health and policy researchers are arguing that prescription drugs need to be considered medically necessary under the Canada Health Act.

The cost of prescriptions is problematic for Canadians who live on low to middle incomes. As precarious work replaces conventional jobs with benefits, more Canadians will find themselves without a drug plan. It's also a concern for individuals who are self-employed or unemployed.

Vote for improvements that will strengthen Canada's universal health care system.

Women's Issues

Up for Debate interviewed Elizabeth May, Thomas Mulcair, Justin Trudeau and Gilles Duceppe. Canadians gained insight into how each leader would address the issues that impact 52 percent of the population.

Harper declined to be interviewed. I'd like to know: if Harper won't speak with women during an election campaign, when will he speak with them?

Harper has been less than equitable with women in the past. He cut funding to Status of Women Canada (SWC), which meant it had to the close of 12 of its 16 regional offices. When funding was reinstated, Harper prohibited SWC from funding the work of organizations doing advocacy or research.

Harper has shown disdain when it comes to increasing women's economic security and prosperity; encouraging women's leadership and democratic participation; and ending violence against women and girls.

Harper does not promote pay equity. He has no plan to implement a federal minimum wage; living wage; or guaranteed living income.

There is no national housing plan beyond Housing First which addresses chronically homeless individuals who are dealing with addiction and mental health issues.

There is no national food policy, meaning food insecurity, hunger, unhealthy diets, poverty, unsustainable food production and climate change are not adequately addressed.

There will be no national child care plan.

Harper showed blatant contempt for women when on May 27, 2015 he instructed all Conservatives in the House of Commons to vote against NDP MP Niki Ashton's motion, M-444, A National Action Plan to End Violence Against Women.

This motion recommended creating a national action plan on violence against women; holding an inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls; and establishing a national child care plan.

Every six days a woman dies at the hands of a current or former partner. There are currently 1,181 murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls. A national child care plan would help women leaving abusive relationships re-enter or remain in the workforce so that they could support themselves and their children.

Violence against women is not, and never has been, a woman's issue. It's time for all Canadians to work toward eradicating violence against women and that includes our new Prime Minister.

Vote for a party that will speak with, and truly listen to, your mother, sisters, aunts, grandmothers, wives, daughters, daughters-in-law, co-workers and all of the women in your life. When women's lives improve, all Canadians benefit.

Indigenous Women

Harper cut all funding to the Sister's in Spirit (SIS) campaign. This campaign raised awareness about Canada's murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls. Annual vigils continue to be held across the country on October 4 to keep the campaign alive.

The Native Women's Association of Canada (NWAC) continued to show support for the SIS campaign by including the SIS logo on materials they distributed. NWAC was threatened with federal funding cuts if it continued using the SIS logo.

Funding was also cut to the Quebec Native Women's Association, Hamilton's Honouring the Circle transitional shelter, and the Native Women's Centre.

These organizations were doing wonderful work but they were becoming too strong, too vocal, and attracting too many of the right people to their causes.

Recently, I had the privilege to hear Dawn Harvard, President of NWAC, and Shelagh Day, co-chair of the Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action talk about the continuous interference and roadblocks put in place by the Harper government to prevent NAWC from securing an investigation and report from the United Nations.

Eventually, the UN did release scathing reports that admonished the Canadian government for failing its Indigenous people, and women and girls in particular.

I was disgusted and embarrassed by the tactics the Harper government used and the lengths that it went to in attempt after attempt to silence Dawn Harvard and her colleagues. Shame on you and your government Harper.

The Truth and Reconciliation Committee, the United Nations, the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and Amnesty International have all called for a national inquiry into Canada's murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls. The inquiry must be followed by the timely implementation of recommendations by the federal government.

The issue of murdered and missing Aboriginal women and girls is a result of the way Indigenous women have been treated since first contact with Europeans.

Women were the keepers of the land and as such their power and authority had to be undermined. Since that time, sexism, racism, and inequality have marginalized these women and girls and created the notion that they are somehow expendable. This attitude is pervasive and it needs to be changed.

Please vote for a national inquiry into our murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls.


Affordable housing is increasingly difficult to find yet, it's the essential first step to reducing poverty, food insecurity, and eradicating violence against women. It's also well documented that owning rather than renting is a very good indicator of health outcomes.

The federal government needs to be at the table with representatives from all provinces, territories and major municipalities in order to solve the national housing crisis. Instead, Harper's government has avoided taking responsibility and continues to mislead the public into believing housing is exclusively a provincial and territorial responsibility.

Harper's housing policy begins and ends with investing in Housing First (HF). HF focuses on finding housing for individuals experiencing chronic homelessness due to addiction and mental health issues.

Even the authors of the HF study stated, "it should be one component of a multi-pronged and evidence-based approach to address the problem of homelessness in Canada."

The Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has recommended that the Canadian government improve and enforce shelter allowances, social assistance rates, provide better support for people with disabilities, and provide adequate transition housing for women leaving abusive relationships.

Access to shelters, transition housing and affordable long term housing as well as affordable child care is imperative to ending violence against women and children. The Housing First model works wonders for people suffering from mental health and addiction issues, but is not the best model for women and their children fleeing abuse.

The HF model also fails to address long wait lists for social housing; the lack of affordable housing for middle and lower income earners; development of market rental housing.

York University's Homeless Hub estimates an investment of $44 billion, or $2.04 per person per week, over the next decade could end homelessness in Canada and make more affordable housing available to more Canadians.

Vote for a National Housing Strategy that dedicates funding to co-operative housing as well as more new affordable housing projects, and increased social housing on and off-reserve for First Nations.

Economic Equity

Pay equity was implemented by the federal government in 1978, but 37 years later, women still earn only 71 percent of what men earn annually.

Lower incomes, combined with time away from the workforce to care for children or aging parents, means women make smaller contributions to Canada's Pension Plan and have less to live on in old age.

The federal government needs to hold employers accountable for ensuring women and men are paid equally for equal work.

Vote for a party that will make this happen.

Food Security

Without a national food policy, the federal government cannot adequately address health, education, economic and environmental issues as they pertain to food insecurity, hunger, unhealthy diets, poverty, unsustainable food production, and climate change.

Sustainable agriculture promotes genetic diversification; economic diversity; reducing reliance on pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, growth hormones, non-therapeutic antibiotics, and insecticides; increasing and supporting young farmers and farm families to ensure Canada remains a nation that can feed itself.

That means rejecting the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, supporting marketing boards, and decreasing inter-provincial/territorial barriers to trade.

Canadians deserve improved food safety regulations that increase inspection and monitoring while removing conflicts of interest within the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

Federally funded, community-guided school lunch programs that will teach healthy eating habits while making use of local ingredients.

We need a moratorium on the patenting of life forms and the use of terminator technologies. We need to ensure that producers of genetically engineered crops are held liable for the damage those crops cause.

We need to promote heritage seed banks; ensure that new plant cultivars and animal breeds remain in the public domain; return to publicly-funded research into organic farming techniques to ensure food sovereignty.

Improved labelling standards need to be established so consumers can make better informed food choices based on the treatment of animals; the origin of food and food products; genetically modified ingredients and foods; improved nutrition labelling.

The government needs to enforce fair and just treatment of agriculture and agri-food workers. Temporary foreign workers should have a means to obtain citizenship.

We need a policy that will ensure healthy and culturally appropriate foods are more accessible in Northern Canada and on reserves where food insecurity rates are 5 to 6 times higher than the national average.

Vote for the party that will protect Canada's food sovereignty and improve food security for all.

Employment Insurance and Old Age Security

Changes to the Employment Insurance (EI) system means fewer Canadians qualify and laid-off workers are forced to accept underemployment or face losing benefits.

Harper increased the age for collecting Old Age Security (OAS) to 67. This caused hardship for widowed and single older women who don't benefit from income splitting but who do often live in poverty.

Vote for positive changes to EI and OAS.

Tuition Relief for Post-secondary Students

Post-secondary education and skills training is essential to Canada's long-term economic, environmental and social health. It's time to vote for a party that will take post-secondary education and its escalating costs seriously.

Harper merely plans to double the federal grant provided to low and middle-income families through the Registered Education Savings Plans (RESP).

At the end of the day, a child from a low-income family unable to contribute to an RESP could receive $2000 plus interest to cover four years of post-secondary education by registering at birth for a Canada Learning Bond.

A family that can make the required minimum contributions each year from birth to 17 years of age will receive $2200 per child in matching government support to pay for college or university.

Guaranteed Livable Income

Financial insecurity leads to inadequate housing, food insecurity, poorer health, greater health-care costs, bouts of depression, and suicidal thoughts that arise from hopelessness. The solution to situational and chronic poverty is simple - Canadians need a Guaranteed Livable Income (GLI).

The Dauphin, Manitoba experiment from 1974 to 1979, in which 1,300 families were provided with an annual income for three years, was a success. Participation in the workforce continued as usual with two exceptions; new mother stayed home longer and teenagers stayed in school rather than quitting to help their families financially.

Individuals were less likely to be underemployed; hospital visits declined 8.5 per cent; there were fewer work-related injuries, mental health issues, and incidents of domestic abuse.

Former Conservative Senator Hugh Segal has been championing the idea of topping up incomes falling below a designated minimum floor. Segal estimates the annual cost would be about $30 billion or less than 10 per cent of the federal budget. Keep in mind that poverty currently costs Canadians $86 billion annually.

Ideally, GLI would be implemented in conjunction with a federal living wage policy to ensure full-time employees earn annual incomes that fall significantly above the poverty line. In addition, every level of government should mandate their employees and contract workers be paid a living wage.

The shift in labour markets toward precarious employment is here to stay. GLI means an individual or family has access to adequate funds for housing and food as required. Over four million adults and children live with food insecurity. GLI could lower this number by 1.2 million individuals which would translate into significant savings for the health-care, justice, and correctional systems.

Neither a national living wage nor a guaranteed livable income is on Harper's agenda. Vote for a party that takes care of more than the top 1 per cent.

Vote for Positive Change

Canada has become a very different country under Harper. It's no longer the country that I knew and loved. It's no longer a country that I'm proud to pass on to my own children and their children. But, together we can change this.

On October 19 reject divisive policies and American-style politics by voting for positive change that will empower and create equality for all Canadians.

Update: this article originally stated that women in Canada pay over 35 percent of their income on child care. In fact that was the rate in the most expensive cities. RTH regrets the error. You can jump to the changed paragraph.

Doreen Nicoll is a feminist and a member of several community organizations working diligently to end poverty, hunger and gendered violence.


View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By mdrejhon (registered) - website | Posted October 16, 2015 at 13:46:45

This is probably one of the best Doreen articles I've read. Thank you.

Even if you disagree with some elements in this article, vote please.

If you don't have voter registration, there's still time: www.elections.ca


Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Ralph (anonymous) | Posted October 16, 2015 at 18:29:21

I think you need a special section about Harper governments attitude towards Muslims, and his attempts to cause fear and hatred, further divide people. Likewise, I don't know how you can miss Harper's foriegn policy issues, especially his die-hard support of Israel despite the atrocities it commits.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By KevinLove (registered) | Posted October 16, 2015 at 23:16:20

I am certainly not a supporter of Mr. Harper and suspect that Doreen and I may be voting for the same political party next week.

Nonetheless, Doreen should not publish blatant and easily detectable falsehoods, as they damage her credibility and the credibility of the causes that she supports.

In particular, this statement of Doreen's is absolutely false:

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) found that women spend over 35 per cent of their income on childcare.

No source was given by Doreen, but Google quickly turned up what the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives actually found.. Which is very different from what Doreen wrote in two very significant ways.

First, they did not look at the income of women in general, but only women between the ages of 25-34. See pages 15-16 of above link.

Second, the cost of childcare came to over 35% of this income only in the worst city in all of Canada. The average in Canada is much lower. To quote from page 6 of the above link:

... we found that Brampton is the least affordable city in Canada for child care. In Brampton, fees are worth 36% of a woman's income, the equivalent of four months' worth of work. This is largely due to lower overall incomes for women in Brampton... The most affordable city for child care in Canada is Gatineau, where child care takes up 4% of a woman's income...

So Doreen's statement is absolutely false.

Permalink | Context

By LOL_all_over_again (registered) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 23:22:44 in reply to Comment 114283

Comments with a score below -5 are hidden by default.

You can change or disable this comment score threshold by registering an RTH user account.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By author (anonymous) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 01:06:05

Sorry KevinLove, but I stand by my research and work.

The International Women's Rights Project Created the Voters Guide on Women's Issues -- Election 2015 and the document states: "The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) has determined that women spend more
than 36% of their incomes on childcare."

This same document was cited, quoted and a link provided in my article: Vote to End Misogyny in Canada (published August 24, 2015).

Please feel free to make your concerns know to the authors of this document.

In the meantime, affordable universal childcare is needed in Canada now.

Permalink | Context

By KevinLove (registered) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 11:07:16 in reply to Comment 114284

This is mildly amusing, in an Orwellian doublethink kind of way.

Just because someone else makes a false statement about the findings of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives that does not magically change those findings or make the false statement true.

It is possible to easily read what the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives actually wrote. The link is to the CCPA document of November 2014 entitled "The Parent Trap: Child Care Fees in Canada's Big Cities."

If one bothers to actually read what the CCPA actually wrote, it is easy to see that Doreen's statement is completely false. It is only in the worst city they looked at, Brampton, that child care fees are over 35% of the median income of women in Brampton who are between the ages of 25 and 34.

Quebec, in specific, is much more affordable, due to the provincial government's policy of $7 per day child care. The worst city in Quebec has child care fees equal to only 6% of the median income of women between the ages of 25 and 34.

For those who could not even be bothered to read, I direct their attention to the bar graph that constitutes Figure 6 on page 15 of the CCPA document. Here is the link again:


CCPA never said what Doreen asserted they did. Indeed, the CCPA document contradicts Doreen's false statement. Which can be easily seen by anyone who reads the document or at least looks at the graph on page 15.

Permalink | Context

By moylek (registered) - website | Posted October 17, 2015 at 15:55:25 in reply to Comment 114285

CCPA never said what Doreen asserted they did. Indeed, the CCPA document contradicts Doreen's false statement. Which can be easily seen by anyone who reads the document or at least looks at the graph on page 15.

You just don't seem to be able to understand, Kevin, do you? I'll try to make it plain: Doreen found a published statement useful for her polemic; she cited quoted it and cited it. Done!

Why do you insist on dragging facts and accuracy into this? Do you hate women?

Comment edited by moylek on 2015-10-17 15:56:22

Permalink | Context

By KevinLove (registered) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 20:23:29 in reply to Comment 114287

Yes, you are right. And good for a chuckle.

On a more serious note, Doreen really needs to learn the difference between primary and secondary sources.

In other words, if B says that A said something, then it is probably a good idea to spend 20 seconds with Google to see if A really did say it. Because 20 seconds is all it took for me to find the CCPA document with their real findings about childcare costs.

Permalink | Context

By jackery (anonymous) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 20:29:19 in reply to Comment 114289

Leave Doreen alone.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By arienc (registered) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 21:49:07

Here's what the Council for Canadian Urbanism had to say about the election. An interesting read. One party scored higher than the others, which they tend to do in nearly all such comparisons, but in total, urbanists should be happy with 3 of the 4 major parties.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By samuel (anonymous) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 22:59:39

disagree re TPP and food security. The marketing boards could care less about sustainable agriculture, good jobs or food security. These are the worst kind of interest groups, whose only purpose is to protect their monopolies, which come at the expense of the general population, since they only drive prices up.

Permalink | Context

By KevinLove (registered) | Posted October 17, 2015 at 23:22:30 in reply to Comment 114292

Yes, that was another interesting Doreenism. Where she wrote about, "...supporting marketing boards, and decreasing inter-provincial/territorial barriers to trade."

Since marketing boards can only maintain their monopoly by keeping in place interprovincial barriers to trade, those two statements contradict each other. For example, Ontario's milk marketing board would collapse if milk from Quebec were freely allowed into Ontario.

Logical consistency? What's that?

Permalink | Context

By AlHuizenga (registered) | Posted October 20, 2015 at 09:58:09 in reply to Comment 114293

I feel like you could constructively criticize the piece without resorting to unnecessary personal criticisms of the author.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By mdrejhon (registered) - website | Posted October 19, 2015 at 10:36:10

(for the moment ignoring drama, or any background that I was unaware of)

Bottom line: VOTE

We can all agree on that.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Noted (anonymous) | Posted October 20, 2015 at 14:28:28

"Breaking a campaign promise, Prime Minister Jean Chretien declared on Thursday that Canada will implement the North American Free Trade Agreement Jan. 1. After failing to get the Clinton administration to reopen NAFTA to correct concerns of his newly installed Liberal government, Chretien opted to accept side deals and assurances from U.S. and Mexican officials as enough to clinch the deal."


Permalink | Context

By Noted (anonymous) | Posted October 20, 2015 at 14:30:35 in reply to Comment 114317

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau will not allow his MPs a free vote on the massive Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement...."We have a very clear policy on free votes that says elements that are in our platform, elements that go to the heart of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and elements that are confidence matters, that is, matters of budget, people would be expected to vote with the Liberal Party," Trudeau went on to say.


Permalink | Context

By CharlesBall (registered) | Posted October 20, 2015 at 14:35:44 in reply to Comment 114318

In fairness to Mr. T and what the future holds, Canada is a small fish in a big pond. Unionists ranting against the agreement will revel no doubt in the closure of all the car plants if Canada does not sign the agreement.

Quid pro quo is the nature of international relations. You have to compromise and do the best you can. If you truly believe that Mr. T. should give em the finger and try and restart the 10 year process, or simply let his caucus vote freely in the hopes that the TPP will not be ratified in Canada, God bless you.

Comment edited by CharlesBall on 2015-10-20 14:37:42

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Noted (anonymous) | Posted October 23, 2015 at 21:50:42

"Suddenly the Liberals seemed like a people’s party. But the Liberals have always been the other face of Canada’s corporate power: less mean and divisive, more skilled and savvy."


Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools