Jason trawls the core for juicy morsels of news.
By Jason Leach
Mar. 18, 2006
Trevor Shaw drew my attention to a recent report on CHML that residents living near the corner of Main St. E. and Sherman St. are voicing opposition to the planned repairs at three notorious buildings on the corner that were magnets for crime before a fire two years ago destroyed them. Apparently the plan to create 59 rental housing units with few parking spots is at issue.
I go by this project everyday as it's a few blocks from our office. The new roof is up and the buildings are beautiful. I'm planning a piece for one of these issues discussing the insane parking bylaws in Hamilton. Any new condo, loft or apartment building must have the same number of parking spaces as units.
Spallacci, for example, initially proposed 123 units with 90 parking spaces, but the city made them do 123 parking spaces. Same with the 200 unit condo on King William: 200 parking spots. How stupid!
Here we are trying to sell urban intensification by saying it won't increase traffic as much as sprawl since some folks will walk, bike and take the bus. Then the city won't even put bike lanes on downtown streets or improve transit, but they force developers to provide hundreds of parking spots. Is our city run by GM and Imperial Oil or what?
By carl
Posted 3/21/2006 8:03:04 AM
it is to bad that people making comments on here would not really check out what is being talked about before making rediculas comments! If they did they would know that the problem for the neibourhood is that when these building inquestion when running suck up all the parking in the area, and why should we have to deal with that?
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 3/21/2006 5:26:33 AM
Why do you think you're entitled to "free" parking? It's something many people living in the lower city are used to (myself included), but that "free" parking comes at a price, and if the person using it isn't paying, then someone else is.
By jason
Posted 3/21/2006 9:20:37 AM
I realize that neighbourhood parking concerns are the reason for city hall to have these parking laws in place, but I think a developer should have the right to say "I'm building a trendy, walk-up loft and don't want any parking. If a prospective buyer needs parking, he's looking at the wrong project." Currently, there are times where the city will make an exception and not force a developer to have parking in their project, but they then force them to 'buy' spaces from surrounding lots for the use of their tenants. Again, if a developer wants to do that, then go ahead. I just don't think it's the city's place to say "you're having parking whether you want it or not." After all, a vibrant, successful city will be one with several condo/loft/apartment projects where the residents live just fine without cars. If we keep mandating that parking spaces must be provided then we are shooting ourselves in the foot. A retailer will say "heck, I don't need to open a store downtown. They all have cars and Main and King are highways. They can make the 10 minute drive to the Meadowlands." Yea, the 10 minute drive. The hour bus ride and impossible bike ride. End result? Folks say "gee, I need a car if I'm going to live in this city" and we undermine all the hard work at downtown revitalization by maintaining our poor treatment of people who use any other form of transportation than the almighty car.
By steeltown
Posted 3/22/2006 8:30:04 AM
A nine storey building at Bay and Hunter? At Bay/Hunter there's that old school, city hall parking lot, an apartment and than an old abandon church. So is this building going at the old church spot? I'm pretty sure that church is listed as an endangered building.
By jason
Posted 3/22/2006 10:28:19 AM
nope...across the street from that church....there are some homes on the north side of Hunter just west of the current highrise at the northwest corner of Bay and Hunter...3 or 4 of those homes are coming down to make way for the building.
By I beleive
Posted 3/23/2006 3:54:37 AM
I am one of the people who rely on public transportation. I Don't mind majority of the streets downtown. I do however hate main st. Especially from Macnabb to just past Landmark place. Its like walking through a canyon that had dried up and been turned into a road. They Something needs to be done here. Taking some cars out of the picture would be a great start.
By Comment
Posted 3/25/2006 10:16:41 AM
I think there is is a point being missed in the parking/no parking debate being waged concerning the buildings at Main and Sherman. They are not trendy condos or lofts being proposed and there are limitted services in the immediate area to support car-free living for the "average" person (ie. a variety of shops, libraries, services, within easy walking distance, etc.). I believe that intensification and reduced emphasis on automobles are crucial for urban spaces but believe also that the infrastructure to support it needs to be in place before it cna really thrive. Maybe insisitng on mixed-use development (ie. commercial / residential) versus parking spots would be a way to go.
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 3/30/2006 7:15:18 AM
"Comment" wrote: "Maybe insisitng on mixed-use development (ie. commercial / residential) versus parking spots would be a way to go." You've got it. That's the only way Hamilton can bootstrap itself into a truly sustainable city.
It's important we communicate with groups such as HPD [Hamiltonians for Progressive Development]. There shouldn't be anything not open." -- Councillor Sam Merulla, commenting on the fact that Richard Gilbert's peak oil report to City Council still has not been released
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
Transit IS Pedestrian-Friendly (Aug. 25, 2008) - I really hope McMaster University will reconsider its decision to move the B-Line express buses off-campus, particularly given that the justification is to make the campus more pedestrian-friendly
Hamilton Lost 20% of Farmland since 1991 (Aug. 25, 2008) -
The Toronto Star has published an interactive map of lost farmland across southern Ontario.
Hamilton alone lost 20 percent of its farms in the 15 years between 1991 and 2006. Click on a high
Fringe Festival Review: I Am Not Neil Young (Aug. 22, 2008) -
What does it mean to live in the shadow of greatness? How can a talent made famous for his ability to impersonate demonstrate or even discover his own true self?
Frank Wilks is not Neil Y
Fringe Festival Review: New Talent (Aug. 22, 2008) -
The emotionally harrowing tale of a young woman driven by circumstance into the escort business, New Talent is simply a tremendous performance.
Interweaving a personal tragedy with a public
Fringe Festival Review: Lear's Shadow (Aug. 22, 2008) - The tragic Lear's Shadow boils Shakespeare's King Lear down to its essence: not the conflict between an insecure father and his treacherous daughters but rather the interplay between a foo
Fringe Festival Review: Because I Can (Aug. 21, 2008) -
Written by Allison McWood and directed by James Henderson, Because I Can is a screwball comedy that parlays a simple premise into a lively hour of very funny entertainment.
Karina Berschteyn
PRINT EDITION
By I Beleive
Posted 3/21/2006 7:39:45 AM
That news regarding the Parking spaces having to match up with the living unit is interesting thought to me. Hopefully someone will come to there sense at city hall
(Permalink)