There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By CharlesBall (registered) | Posted July 07, 2015 at 16:42:26 in reply to Comment 112628
Generally I agree with you. When I was forced to get a pleasure craft license I hated it. I think I have a right to travel on the water (it is not a privilege like on a roadway.) I think the police have no business asking for your id absent probable cause. (That applies in every situation that I can imagine - police are our employees there to serve us.)
But if we really want to ramp up cycling, and cars and bikes interact much more frequently, for self protection as much as anything carrying id is a must.
In a world absent cars, I am not sure that registering bikes would be all that important. In a world where bikes and cars did not interact I don't think it would be important either. But in a world where they interact a lot it makes sense to me.
On our roads, we have a first party no fault system. That means that if you are injured by a car as a cyclist or a pedestrian, unless you have your own insurance, you are subject to the insurance of the car you are involved with. That places all of the control in the hands of the car's insurer. I would much rather control that myself. I would like to set the terms of the contract for insurance that I carry and not rely on what, if any, insurance the car driver carries.
It is not about punishing cyclists. It's about being proactive in the world in which we are forced to live.
A responsible parent would never set out on the roadways, leaving children at home, without carrying identification and ensuring that if they are killed or maimed, whether through the driver's fault or not, that they were not properly covered.
One of my friends was killed last year leaving two young kids at home. The driver was not to blame for his death (for that matter it doesn't even matter if a car was involved.) I can't imagine what his kids would have gone through if he was not insured. Luckily a car was involved and so his auto policy responded. But if he had not had an auto policy, or if a car was not involved, it would have added greatly to the tragedy.
In addition, under most auto policies there is an unidentified/underinsured rider called the family endorsement. So if you are injured by a hit and run driver, or a driver carrying inadequate insurance, you are covered. When I was a teen one of my friends was killed riding home at night either by a driver who fled or did not know he knocked him down into a culvert. He had no coverage. If he had had dependents it would have been an even more obscene tragedy.
Comment edited by CharlesBall on 2015-07-07 16:58:48
No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be? George Orwell
Permalink | Context