- Free Public Talk - Fracking for Oil & Gas: Character and Consequences - October 01, 2016, at McMaster University Medical Centre, Ewart Angus centre,Rm. 1A1, 1200 Main St. W, Hamilton
- 21 Upcoming Events...
Recent Articles
- Herkimer, Charlton Bike Lanes Balance Local and City-Wide Needsby Ryan McGreal, published September 30, 2016 in Special Report: Cycling
(19 comments)
- Collins' LRT Referendum Ploy Would be a Cowardly Cop-Outby RTH Staff, published September 30, 2016 in Special Report: Light Rail
(15 comments)
- Print-Your-Own LRT Support Posters Now Availableby RTH Staff, published September 28, 2016 in Special Report: Light Rail
(1 comment)
- LRT Opposition and Fear of Changeby Michael Nabert, published September 28, 2016 in Special Report: Light Rail
(29 comments)
- 1inFour Receives HCF Funding to Help Women in Hamilton Heal from Domestic Violenceby Doreen Nicoll, published September 28, 2016 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Act Now to Save Parkside High School From Demolitionby Shannon Kyles, published September 27, 2016 in Special Report: Heritage
(5 comments)
- Hamilton is Not 'Nowhere'by Ryan McGreal, published September 26, 2016 in Special Report: Light Rail
(6 comments)
- Bike Lane Celebration and Glow Rideby Nicholas Kevlahan, published September 26, 2016 in Special Report: Cycling
(7 comments)
- Remove it and They Will Disappearby Nicholas Kevlahan, published September 26, 2016 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Stills in Motion: Glow Rideby Dave Harrison, published September 26, 2016 in Stills in Motion
(1 comment)
- We Can't Make the Same Mistake Twiceby Doreen Nicoll, published September 26, 2016 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Hamilton Needs to Design for Health and Illness Preventionby Maureen Wilson, published September 22, 2016 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(2 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Mr. Meister (anonymous) | Posted May 17, 2009 at 18:17:52
Actually I tend to post on the silliest most inane themes because the lack of common sense drives me nuts.
I really do not understand your point of view. Why would you want to increase your risk of getting hit by a car? I was hit by a car when I was a child and I can affirm that it is not in anyway shape or form a good thing. I do most everything I can to improve the chances of getting where ever I am going safe and sound whether that is by air, road, rail or walking. Why would anybody advocate increasing the chances of getting seriously hurt? I trust my driving a lot but I have seen enough idiots driving on our streets that I do not trust anybody's driving any more than I have to. Better 20 minutes late on earth than 20 years to early in heaven.
If the reason for changing our laws is because enforcement does not work then the first law that should be changed is the one that is broken the most and by most accounts that would be theft. How well do you think that will work?
Permalink | Context