Comment 32137

By realitycheck (anonymous) | Posted June 26, 2009 at 13:50:29

This is not money to build a second runway. The second runway already exists. This is a land acquisition transaction so to allow expansion of the existing second runway at the airport, not for construction of a new runway. Perhaps, for the sake of journalistic accuracy, the second paragraph can be corrected to reflect this fact.

In keeping with the leasing agreement, construction of the runway expansion will be a tradeport expense, not a city expense.







Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds