Comment 62503

By Undustrial (registered) - website | Posted April 20, 2011 at 10:57:04

The burden of proof is on Winn. Firstly, as described in the article, it is his job to facilitate the entry of candidates into the electoral process, and to be as inclusive as possible. Secondly, the errors described don't indicate that Burson is seriously lacking anything she "needs" to run legally - only paperwork and deadline issues. And thirdly, excluding a party/candidate from an election is a very serious decision, which should require more than an "I said so".

I'm willing to hear him out - but I've heard very little so far to justify this action.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds