Comment 68896

By mystoneycreek (registered) - website | Posted September 01, 2011 at 13:42:01 in reply to Comment 68892

Are you suggesting that the $3-5 million estimate actually published by staff after inspecting the site and the Mayor's back-of-the-envelope $35-40 million estimate are both fake?

Uh, no. (And I'm surprised that you took that from my point.)

What I am suggesting is that in order to discuss this properly (again, both discussions, de-amalgamation and West Harbour, but obviously in this instance, West Harbour) , we need actual figures. Not rough guesstimates, not hearsay. Because we're talking about something far more important than the weather, or the estimated cost of gold, or whether ballroom dancing is making a comeback. This is a pivotal aspect of Hamilton's development...and I resent someone in authority being lax with the dissemination of information. Especially when they're not actually the steward of it.

Comment edited by mystoneycreek on 2011-09-01 13:42:43

Reply | Permalink | Context

You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds